Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567187
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate |
| Date | 2017-01-26 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3O4p-5aO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t3xGh-3sb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote: > The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give > users this option. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > This was discussed almost one year ago, with no clear conclusion, but > also no evidence that the driver can't be built as a module. Is there > any way to push this forward? I see ACKs for this patch, but in my git I also have: commit 360943a8d26265825025b88da32961bd9ad4f7c6 pinctrl: baytrail: make it explicitly non-modular Acked by Mika. So which one is it going to be? If this should be applied, the previous patch from Paul Gortmaker should be reverted first. Especially the runtime PM parts seem important to get back. Then I want a patch reverting that and adding this tristate in one. Yours, Linus Walleij
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-26 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-01-26 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2017-01-26 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:40 +0100
csiph-web