Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.security > #5064

Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?

From Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
Date 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
Message-ID <su0vw-2D0-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <srpgJ-3eb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <srtu2-6cx-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <srPux-4ML-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <srT57-7eS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <stJbj-6WG-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016, at 18:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Right.  Debian kernel updates can only be applied with a reboot.  If
> we publish a kernel update, its mere availability may put some of our
> users out of compliance with their policies, which is why we batch
> these updates.

Is this correct?  Really?

-- 
  Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 17:10 +0200
  Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 22:10 +0200
      Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 23:10 +0200
        Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-12 12:50 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
              Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-13 20:40 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2016-10-18 22:30 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Alexander Schreiber <als@thangorodrim.ch> - 2016-10-20 01:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-20 02:40 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-12 22:40 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200

csiph-web