Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5058

Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?

From Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
Date 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
Message-ID <srtu2-6cx-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sr6QO-8jN-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sr7a9-8qo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <srbx7-2Kh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <srctb-3jq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <srpgJ-3eb-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:43:41AM -0000, te3d4q@sigaint.org wrote:
>1. If I understood correctly the contents of your reply, on what basis
>does the Debian security team assess the severity of each security
>vulnerability? What are those criteria?

You'll find that there's a lot of criticism of CVSS in the industry, and 
that a real CVSS number depends heavily on temporal and environmental 
factors which aren't reflected in the NVD baseline. It's not 
particularly uncommon for base scores to be overinflated given 
configuration specifics, or to understate the importance of 
vulnerabilities being actively exploited. Relying soley on base scores 
to prioritize actions without considering the environmental or temporal 
factors is a mistake per the guidelines on how to use CVSS.

>2. Your latest reply implies strongly the possibility of the Debian
>security team's assessments of security vulnerabilities differing from
>those of the security teams of other popular Linux distros such as Gentoo,
>Kali, ArchLinux, Ubuntu, etc. Am I correct?

You'll find that no vendor uses CVSS base scores in NVD to strictly 
prioritize their work.

>As an example, ArchLinux issues a patch for a security vulnerability
>CVE-2016-xyz with an NVD rating of medium risk. However the Debian
>security team does not issue a fix for it.

To have an example, you'd need specifics. This is a hypothetical without 
a question. If the implicit question is "could this happen" the answer 
is yes, but you'd need to discuss a specific case to find out why.

Mike Stone

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 17:10 +0200
  Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 22:10 +0200
      Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 23:10 +0200
        Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-12 12:50 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
              Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-13 20:40 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2016-10-18 22:30 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Alexander Schreiber <als@thangorodrim.ch> - 2016-10-20 01:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-20 02:40 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-12 22:40 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200

csiph-web