Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > ger.ct > #536205

Re: Sugar in the morning...

From Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups ger.ct
Subject Re: Sugar in the morning...
Date 2022-01-01 11:40 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <sqpb2i$7g3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <sqp5g3$5k9$1@tota-refugium.de> <j7k5aixag3.ln2@diedrich.ddnssec.de> <sqp8oo$dufu$1@tota-refugium.de> <sqp9f9$uam$2@dont-email.me> <sqpa5s$e0hd$1@tota-refugium.de>

Show all headers | View raw

On 01.01.2022 11:25, Stephan Bumberger wrote:

>>> Es sind weit mehr als 50 %.
>>
>> Wieso nochmal arbeitest du nicht für die Regierung und regelst das für uns?
> 
> Ist das jetzt dieses alte Totschlagargument? Man darf nichts
> kritisieren, wenn man nicht an der Erstellung beteiligt ist?

Nö. Wie kommst du darauf?
Kritisieren darf man alles, aber wenn man alles besser weiss, sollte man 
schon was vorweisen.

Achso, Meinung meinst du. Ja, die darf man auch haben, aber man sollte 
sie nicht regelmässig als Fakt ansehen.

 > Ein Restaurantkritiker muss auch kein Sternekoch sein, er muss
 > nur wissen, wie es bei Sterneköchen schmecken muss.

Also muss er zumindest Erfahrung und Geschmackssinn vorweisen können.

Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Sugar in the morning... Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2021-12-31 23:25 +0000
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-12-31 23:41 +0000
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 07:02 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 09:47 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 10:05 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2022-01-01 10:41 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2022-01-01 10:46 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:09 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2022-01-01 11:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:00 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:12 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 02:24 -0800
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:25 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:40 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-01-02 09:30 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-01-02 21:18 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:02 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 11:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:20 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:11 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 12:31 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-01 13:00 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:41 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 21:45 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2022-01-02 07:03 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 02:22 -0800
          Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:02 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 13:43 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 15:08 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 15:15 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-01-05 15:02 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-05 18:52 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2022-01-05 18:27 +0000
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-05 19:44 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2022-01-05 18:57 +0000
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-05 20:23 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Ebert <mx300@gmx.net> - 2022-01-05 23:46 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-06 07:45 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Ebert <mx300@gmx.net> - 2022-01-06 15:20 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-06 17:04 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-06 21:00 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-01-05 22:23 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:47 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 21:57 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 21:31 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:53 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 22:00 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 13:05 -0800
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-01 10:51 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:18 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 10:30 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:02 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 12:19 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 04:36 -0800
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Christian Schumacher <cs.spam@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-01-01 20:22 +0000
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:59 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-02 09:42 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-01-02 09:20 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:16 +0100
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-01-03 04:44 -0800
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 13:50 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-03 17:36 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 20:43 +0100
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Ebert <mx300@gmx.net> - 2022-01-04 23:56 +0100

csiph-web