Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449412

Re: Possibly good?

From Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Possibly good?
Message-ID <soo9eddajl7mp0l485ic69foappnb6actc@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <9l.zbvuo3@rooftop.invalid> <fkjmvqFjr79U1@mid.individual.net> <saxzc9v03.avuo@rooftop.invalid> <evl9edtr0nd63btrkpvt12l911jlbfu8or@4ax.com> <9aa0b80a.3ha@rooftop.invalid>
Organization blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date 2018-04-28 17:11 -0400

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:56:18 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
wrote:

>a.m <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:08:58 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/28/18 9:01 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/28/18 8:01 AM, a.m wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:28:42 -0700, Snit
>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/27/18 3:03 PM, F. Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:03:28 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In another month, the EU's General Data Protection Regulation becomes
>>>>>>>>>> enforceable.  It provides strict requirements
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know that law so I cannot comment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I do know that both European _and_ American politics is
>>>>>>>>> REACTIVE rather than PROACTIVE.  The politicians should see
>>>>>>>>> these things coming far in advance but they never do.  Consequently
>>>>>>>>> most laws are unfortunately always "too little and too late."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Climate change is a great examples of this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The same scientists who claimed that we'd all be underwater right now
>>>>>>> are now admitting that they were wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who said we would be under water? The oceans HAVE risen. The predictions
>>>>>> have been amazingly accurate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/950748/climate-change-scientists-impact-not-as-bad-on-planet>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You hand-picked one study. One. In the past you have hand-picked some
>>>>>> others. But you are hand-picking and ignoring the overall picture... the
>>>>>> overall science. You are seeking confirmation bias and finding it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is the essence of "climate science."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as you picking and choosing, here is another recent study (or
>>>>>> article, from a more scientific source, which talks about the study):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-just-breached-the-410-ppm-threshold-for-co2/>
>>>>>> OR <https://goo.gl/nZkZmM>
>>>>>>      -----
>>>>>>      The world just passed another round-numbered climate milestone.
>>>>>>      Scientists predicted it would happen this year and lo and behold, it
>>>>>>      has.
>>>>>>      ...
>>>>>>      Earlier this year, U.K. Met Office scientists issued their
>>>>>>      first-ever carbon dioxide forecast. They projected carbon dioxide
>>>>>>      could reach 410 ppm in March and almost certainly would by April.
>>>>>>      Their forecast has been borne out with Tuesday's daily record. They
>>>>>>      project that the monthly average will peak near 407 ppm in May,
>>>>>>      setting a monthly record.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Carbon dioxide concentrations have skyrocketed over the past two
>>>>>>      years due to in part to natural factors like El Nino causing more of
>>>>>>      it to end up in the atmosphere. But it's mostly driven by the record
>>>>>>      amounts of carbon dioxide humans are creating by burning fossil
>>>>>>      fuels.
>>>>>>      -----
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> The plants of Earth rejoice!
>>>>> 
>>>> If you truly want to learn about man-made global climate change go to 
>>>> any -- literally ANY -- scientific site that states a position. Follow 
>>>> some of their references to learn more.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>I would love to see Antarctica uncovered in my lifetime, and I couldn't
>>>care less about Florida.  Let that shit sink.
>> 
>> Yes owl, make sure you go to _ANY_ scientific site that states a
>> position but makes sure that it states whatever position the Prescott
>> cockroach agrees with otherwise go to any _OTHER_ scientific site and
>> do the same. If you can't find one that agrees with Michael Glasser,
>> make sure that you ask him to send you his pre-approved list of _ANY_
>> scientific site.
>
>What does snit know about science?  He thinks psychology is a science.
>You know, that field of "study" that changes its determinations based
>on political pressure.

Michael Glasser learned everything that he ever needed to know about
science during his days as a test subject for psychiatric medicine...
to help with his anxiety, obviously.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Possibly good? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-26 11:49 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:28 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 22:24 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:38 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 21:47 -0700
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 15:51 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 00:39 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 23:32 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 03:45 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 11:03 -0500
    Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-27 22:03 +0000
      Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:28 -0700
        Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 11:01 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 08:52 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:01 +0000
              Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:56 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:48 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 19:08 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:23 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:59 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:11 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:33 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:35 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:27 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:27 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:41 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:06 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 00:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:22 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:53 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:16 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:54 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 20:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 03:03 +0000
                Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-29 04:44 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 05:13 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:21 -0400
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:18 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:42 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:34 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 10:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 13:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:15 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 06:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 15:29 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 16:05 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 16:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 17:40 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 19:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 12:43 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:26 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 13:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:05 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 09:23 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:27 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 +0000
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 13:44 -0400
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:54 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:56 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-04-28 21:01 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 12:59 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:51 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:57 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 21:04 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:17 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:41 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 01:21 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:09 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:40 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:26 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 23:13 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:19 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:04 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:38 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:24 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:34 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 02:53 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:34 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:39 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:20 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:37 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 15:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:47 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:40 -0400
            Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:03 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:03 -0500
              Re: Possibly good? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-30 14:14 +0100
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 04:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 05:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 06:09 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 07:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 14:52 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 14:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 15:01 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:01 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:21 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 08:31 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:41 -0400
      Re: Possibly good? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:29 -0700

csiph-web