Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #688337
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Date | 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnvuehc7.r9s.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> (permalink) |
| References | <vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me> <1830f15ad744a064$76635$735129$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.] On 2025-03-28, Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> >> NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is >> really enough to take Windows forward. >> > > Whatever the case, it will be another proprietary format that GNU/Linux > cannot (easily) access. > > IIRC, it tooks many years befor GNU/Linux was able to correctly access > and write NTFS files. > > I still would not trust the Linux kernel module for writing NTFS even > though it is regarded to be stable and free from error. > > In the not-so-rare times that I must interchange files between Winblows > and GNU/Linux I will use either VFAT or EXFAT format. > > > Is there any particular experience that you had that made you distrust the Linux NTFS driver? I've found it quite robust, but that is just my experience. Neverthess, I do still choose exfat or if necessary, vfat for shared partitions.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-27 18:26 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-27 22:26 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-27 20:25 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 20:00 +1100
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 06:14 -0700
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:23 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:18 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:17 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:29 -0500
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:43 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 03:21 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:13 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-03-28 10:40 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:31 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 00:57 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-29 00:38 -0400
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 11:46 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 22:20 +0000
Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-29 23:42 +0000
csiph-web