Re: well it works!

From	"Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: well it works!
Date	2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
Message-ID	<slrnl9voum.qs6.hellsop@nibelheim.ninehells.com> (permalink)
References	<4vqxivj3iuw8.ey12tuyi0m6k$.dlg@40tude.net> <l7ntr7$aq9$1@dont-email.me> <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net> <96lv99hgalmvduhihn9v0iso2d3hecvth0@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:20:22 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:02:44 -0500, richard <noreply@example.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty
>>wrote:
>>
>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>
>>Says you.
>
> Holy shit, I agree with BtS. That is horribly and ugly.

Oh come on... After all the work we've put in on this....

-- 
83. If I'm eating dinner with the hero, put poison in his goblet, then 
    have to leave the table for any reason, I will order new drinks for
    both of us instead of trying to decide whether or not to switch 
    with him. --Peter Anspach's list of things to do as an Evil Overlord

Thread

well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
  Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 18:55 +0000
    Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 15:02 -0500
      Re: well it works! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-04 21:10 +0000
        Re: well it works! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-12-04 23:56 -0500
          Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 08:27 +0100
            Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 10:21 +0000
              Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 12:08 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 12:51 +0000
              Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 14:35 +0100
              Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 15:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 17:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 19:11 +0000
            Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:08 +0000
      Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 22:03 +0000
        Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-05 16:42 -0500
          Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 23:20 +0000
      Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:20 -0800
        Re: well it works! "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
          Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
  Re: well it works! Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
    Re: well it works! Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
    Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
  no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Dennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-09 14:12 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 23:15 -0500

csiph-web