Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

From	Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Date	2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<l82ugr$bf6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<4vqxivj3iuw8.ey12tuyi0m6k$.dlg@40tude.net> <2vcbna-40e.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <1krlxaupd3tvi$.9yaivc5havv5$.dlg@40tude.net> <sspena-pgt.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/08/2013 01:20 PM, Luuk wrote:
> On 08-12-2013 18:33, richard wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>>
>>> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> no, it does not
>>>
>>> the site says: "Select year or letter"
>>>
>>> But the "or letter" part does not work.....
>>
>> Because there are no links on the letters.
>> Does the location "test" mean anything?
>> I was speaking of the functional part of including a page within an
>> iframe.
>>
>> See my "new" homepage and you'll get a different look at what I am
>> working
>> on now.
>>
>> www.mroldies.net
>> All links work, but with some, you will see no changes.
>
> What is the use of link, when no changes happen?
>
> /me is a little bit confused.....
>
>> And you will kindly note, I ditched the iframe.
>>
>
>

Nothing on that page is working... the URL never changes.

-- 
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
-Have you been to www.php.net yet?-

Thread

well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
  Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 18:55 +0000
    Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 15:02 -0500
      Re: well it works! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-04 21:10 +0000
        Re: well it works! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-12-04 23:56 -0500
          Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 08:27 +0100
            Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 10:21 +0000
              Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 12:08 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 12:51 +0000
              Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 14:35 +0100
              Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 15:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 17:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 19:11 +0000
            Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:08 +0000
      Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 22:03 +0000
        Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-05 16:42 -0500
          Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 23:20 +0000
      Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:20 -0800
        Re: well it works! "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
          Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
  Re: well it works! Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
    Re: well it works! Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
    Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
  no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Dennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-09 14:12 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 23:15 -0500

csiph-web