Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

From	"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Date	2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<l83874$nd7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <2vcbna-40e.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <1krlxaupd3tvi$.9yaivc5havv5$.dlg@40tude.net> <sspena-pgt.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <l82ugr$bf6$1@dont-email.me> <ridzval58c8v.fuic8kapinox$.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw

richard the r00de wrote:

> Bullshit liar you are.

R00de!!!

> Who says the URL has to change?

We all do. Else how is it (the link) supposed to do anything?

> I could have tons of stuff all on one page.

You already do, none of which is worthwhile.

> With a little javascrpt, you see it when you click on a link.

No, we don't.

> I use php include to change what you see.

You don't know enough about PHP to make that a true statement. All you 
know is copying scripts of others and putting them on ugly pages.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

Thread

well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
  Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 18:55 +0000
    Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 15:02 -0500
      Re: well it works! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-04 21:10 +0000
        Re: well it works! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-12-04 23:56 -0500
          Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 08:27 +0100
            Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 10:21 +0000
              Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 12:08 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 12:51 +0000
              Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 14:35 +0100
              Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 15:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 17:15 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 19:11 +0000
            Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:08 +0000
      Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 22:03 +0000
        Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-05 16:42 -0500
          Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 23:20 +0000
      Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:20 -0800
        Re: well it works! "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
          Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
  Re: well it works! Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
    Re: well it works! Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
    Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
  no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Dennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
    Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-09 14:12 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 23:15 -0500

csiph-web