Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof |
| Date | 2021-09-05 09:37 +0000 |
| Organization | muc.de e.V. |
| Message-ID | <sh234f$nmu$1@news.muc.de> (permalink) |
| References | <2KidnW0lAqejJq_8nZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <sh0cej$24fe$1@news.muc.de> <96WdnSMro6-uKq78nZ2dnUU7-aOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <bSOYI.24045$nR3.12924@fx38.iad> <87sfykoyo2.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote: > Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> writes: >> On 9/4/21 2:13 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 9/4/2021 1:04 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>> [ Malicious cross posting snipped. ] >>>> In comp.theory olcott <NoOne@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>> .... valid on the basis of the known equivalence between the direct >>>>> execution of a computation and its simulation by a UTM. >>>> Not really. There might well not be a simulation of the program. >>> I am stopping here. If it is impossible to simulate the TM description >>> of a TM then it is not a proper TM. > I am pretty sure he is referring to the unwarranted assumption that any > simulation at all is involved. Thanks, Ben, that's exactly what I was trying to say. Apologies to PO for being unclear, here. > The context has been lost, including the key part that Alan was > objecting to: > || In computability theory, the halting problem is the > || problem of determining, from a description of an arbitrary > || computer program and an input, > || whether the simulation of this program must be aborted to > || prevent it from running forever. > The phrase "the simulation" implies there is simulation involved. Had > PO written "whether /a/ simulation of this program runs forever" the > reference to simulation would be silly and superfluous, but not wrong. > -- > Ben. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-03 19:18 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-03 21:05 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-03 20:18 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-03 21:53 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-03 21:13 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 06:50 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 08:52 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 10:14 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 09:06 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 10:18 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 09:58 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 11:16 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2021-09-04 10:19 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 11:40 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 11:09 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 12:33 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 11:55 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 13:13 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 12:21 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2021-09-04 13:34 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 12:46 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 14:15 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 13:47 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 16:48 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 15:59 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-04 22:11 +0100
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 18:01 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 17:15 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 18:39 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 17:52 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 19:09 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-09-17 19:27 +0100
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-17 13:41 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-17 15:15 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-17 14:19 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-17 16:02 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 15:11 -0700
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-17 17:36 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof [ Liar Liar pants on fire ] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-17 19:28 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 10:16 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 11:44 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 11:43 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-09-04 18:04 +0000
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-04 13:13 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-04 14:25 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-04 21:47 +0100
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-09-05 09:37 +0000
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof: [ Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-09-05 09:46 -0500
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof: [ Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ ] Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-05 16:08 +0100
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof: [ Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ ] Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2021-09-05 12:41 -0400
Re: The key mistake of the Peter Linz HP proof Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-04 22:40 +0100
csiph-web