Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1521903

Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods recheck dyntick idle state

From Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods recheck dyntick idle state
Date 2016-11-14 18:30 +0100
Message-ID <sDteW-1wp-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sDsLU-16h-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sDsLV-16h-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:57:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Expedited grace periods check dyntick-idle state, and avoid sending
> IPIs to idle CPUs, including those running guest OSes, and, on NOHZ_FULL
> kernels, nohz_full CPUs.  However, the kernel has been observed checking
> a CPU while it was non-idle, but sending the IPI after it has gone
> idle.  This commit therefore rechecks idle state immediately before
> sending the IPI, refraining from IPIing CPUs that have since gone idle.
> 
> Reported-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

atomic_add_return(0, ...) seems odd.  Do you actually want that, rather
than atomic_read(...)?  If so, can you please document exactly why?

>  kernel/rcu/tree.h     |  1 +
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 12 +++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index e99a5234d9ed..fe98dd24adf8 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
>  	atomic_long_t exp_workdone1;	/* # done by others #1. */
>  	atomic_long_t exp_workdone2;	/* # done by others #2. */
>  	atomic_long_t exp_workdone3;	/* # done by others #3. */
> +	int exp_dynticks_snap;		/* Double-check need for IPI. */
>  
>  	/* 7) Callback offloading. */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index 24343eb87b58..d3053e99fdb6 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -358,8 +358,10 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(struct rcu_state *rsp,
>  			struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
>  			struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
>  
> +			rdp->exp_dynticks_snap =
> +				atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks);
>  			if (raw_smp_processor_id() == cpu ||
> -			    !(atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1) ||
> +			    !(rdp->exp_dynticks_snap & 0x1) ||
>  			    !(rnp->qsmaskinitnext & rdp->grpmask))
>  				mask_ofl_test |= rdp->grpmask;
>  		}
> @@ -377,9 +379,17 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(struct rcu_state *rsp,
>  		/* IPI the remaining CPUs for expedited quiescent state. */
>  		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
>  			unsigned long mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
> +			struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
> +			struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> +
>  			if (!(mask_ofl_ipi & mask))
>  				continue;
>  retry_ipi:
> +			if (atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) !=
> +			    rdp->exp_dynticks_snap) {
> +				mask_ofl_test |= mask;
> +				continue;
> +			}
>  			ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, rsp, 0);
>  			if (!ret) {
>  				mask_ofl_ipi &= ~mask;
> -- 
> 2.5.2
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.10 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/7] rcu: Remove obsolete comment from __call_rcu() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/7] rcu: Remove obsolete rcu_check_callbacks() header comment "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/7] rcu: RCU_TRACE enables event tracing as well as debugfs "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/7] rcu: Don't kick unless grace period or request "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] rcu: Tighten up __call_rcu() rcu_head alignment check "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods recheck dyntick idle state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods  recheck dyntick idle state Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-11-14 18:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods  recheck dyntick idle state Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-14 18:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods  recheck dyntick idle state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 19:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods  recheck dyntick idle state Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-15 09:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] rcu: Make expedited grace periods  recheck dyntick idle state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-15 15:40 +0100
  [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] torture: Trace long read-side delays "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 18:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] torture: Trace long read-side delays Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-11-14 18:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] torture: Trace long read-side delays "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-11-14 19:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] torture: Trace long read-side delays Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-11-14 20:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.10 Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2016-11-14 18:30 +0100

csiph-web