Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #174327

Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists

From David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists
Date 2016-11-07 21:30 +0100
Message-ID <sAYIh-87K-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sAevM-3oS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAeYN-3yw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAfLb-47w-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAS0b-3Aq-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAY5A-7Bb-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+0000), Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0000, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> > > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is
> > > >now moribund apart from LTS.
> > > 
> > > We seem to have different understandings of what LTS stands for.
> > > 
> > > Interesting.
> > 
> > At least remember what the "S" stands for (Brian).
> 
> Noted. Also note that support from all those Wheezy users here wasn't
> exactly rampant.

What are we to get rampant about? The OP posted a workaround right
there in the OP, and glossed it in a follow-up.

Most of the thread appears to have discussed the opinion expressed in
your first paragraph.

> I've stopped thinking about Lenny and Potato, too.

So have I, but currently I get a fully automatic bluetooth service for
my mobiles from wheezy which I have not managed to translate to jessie.

If stretch is going into freeze, then I'll probably skip bothering
about bluetooth on jessie.

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:10 +0100
  Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:30 +0100
  Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 20:40 +0100
    Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-11-05 21:00 +0100
      Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 21:40 +0100
    Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 21:30 +0100
      Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-07 14:20 +0100
        Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 20:50 +0100
          Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 21:30 +0100
            Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 00:30 +0100
              Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 01:20 +0100
                Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 20:20 +0100
                Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-13 22:30 +0100

csiph-web