Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #174327
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists |
| Date | 2016-11-07 21:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sAYIh-87K-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sAevM-3oS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAeYN-3yw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAfLb-47w-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAS0b-3Aq-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAY5A-7Bb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+0000), Brian wrote: > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0000, davidson@freevolt.org wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote: > > > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc. > > > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is > > > >now moribund apart from LTS. > > > > > > We seem to have different understandings of what LTS stands for. > > > > > > Interesting. > > > > At least remember what the "S" stands for (Brian). > > Noted. Also note that support from all those Wheezy users here wasn't > exactly rampant. What are we to get rampant about? The OP posted a workaround right there in the OP, and glossed it in a follow-up. Most of the thread appears to have discussed the opinion expressed in your first paragraph. > I've stopped thinking about Lenny and Potato, too. So have I, but currently I get a fully automatic bluetooth service for my mobiles from wheezy which I have not managed to translate to jessie. If stretch is going into freeze, then I'll probably skip bothering about bluetooth on jessie. Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:10 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:30 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 20:40 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-11-05 21:00 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 21:40 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 21:30 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-07 14:20 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 20:50 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 21:30 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 00:30 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 01:20 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 20:20 +0100
Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-13 22:30 +0100
csiph-web