Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #174287

Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists

From Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists
Date 2016-11-07 14:20 +0100
Message-ID <sAS0b-3Aq-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sAevM-3oS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAeYN-3yw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAfLb-47w-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0000, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is
> >now moribund apart from LTS.
> 
> We seem to have different understandings of what LTS stands for.
> 
> Interesting.

At least remember what the "S" stands for (Brian).

There are plenty of people still running wheezy, and there will be for
many years to come (long after wheezy LTS is discontinued).  If you don't
wish to support it, that's fine -- you can simply not reply.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:10 +0100
  Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:30 +0100
  Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 20:40 +0100
    Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-11-05 21:00 +0100
      Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 21:40 +0100
    Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 21:30 +0100
      Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-07 14:20 +0100
        Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 20:50 +0100
          Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 21:30 +0100
            Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 00:30 +0100
              Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 01:20 +0100
                Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 20:20 +0100
                Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-13 22:30 +0100

csiph-web