Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists

From	Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists
Date	2016-11-07 20:50 +0100
Message-ID	<sAY5A-7Bb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sAevM-3oS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAeYN-3yw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAfLb-47w-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAS0b-3Aq-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +0000, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is
> > >now moribund apart from LTS.
> > 
> > We seem to have different understandings of what LTS stands for.
> > 
> > Interesting.
> 
> At least remember what the "S" stands for (Brian).

Noted. Also note that support from all those Wheezy users here wasn't
exactly rampant.

> There are plenty of people still running wheezy, and there will be for
> many years to come (long after wheezy LTS is discontinued).  If you don't
> wish to support it, that's fine -- you can simply not reply.

The last bit is excellent advice; I wish someone had been around at the
time to advise me. :) 

I've stopped thinking about Lenny and Potato, too.

-- 
Brian.

Thread

apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:10 +0100
  Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 20:30 +0100
  Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 20:40 +0100
    Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2016-11-05 21:00 +0100
      Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-05 21:40 +0100
    Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-05 21:30 +0100
      Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-07 14:20 +0100
        Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 20:50 +0100
          Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-07 21:30 +0100
            Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 00:30 +0100
              Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 01:20 +0100
                Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 20:20 +0100
                Re: apt-get changelog is unsuccessful, but changelog exists davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-11-13 22:30 +0100

csiph-web