Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #80057

Re: lamda-optimization

From MrSpook_x510g@6uikovuenojv.gov.uk
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: lamda-optimization
Date 2021-06-01 18:27 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <s95u70$1gqo$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <s90mhf$2ha$1@dont-email.me> <bcf71774-0c95-4741-9d68-7f0b30ec584en@googlegroups.com> <s91nuk$e0p$1@dont-email.me> <s93e5p$5gc$1@redfloyd.dont-email.me> <s94mgp$1l4$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 07:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> wrote:
>red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> wrote:
>> On 5/30/2021 9:16 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>> You're so ultimately stupid.
>> 
>> Hint:  an ad hominem reply means you have lost the debate
>
>That's not an ad hominem. Insulting someone is not an ad hominem. That's
>a surprisingly (and sadly) common misconception.
>
>An ad hominem argument is arguing against the claim made by someone by
>alluding to something objectionable about that person, which has nothing
>to do with the claim. Like, for example, "he has committed this heinous
>crime, therefore what he's claiming about this mathematical proof is
>not to be trusted" (not with those exact words, of course, but as the
>fundamental idea). In the current day and age perhaps even more commonly
>"he holds these political beliefs, therefore what he's saying (about
>this thing completely unrelated to politics) is not to be trusted".
>
>"An attack to the person" does not mean "being aggressive towards the
>person (eg. with insults or swearwords)". It means "trying to discredit
>what the person is saying by discrediting the reputation of the person".

Calling someone stupid fits that description nicely.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-05-31 12:41 -0700
  Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 06:15 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 15:24 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-06-01 09:04 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 18:42 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2021-06-01 20:26 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:33 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-01 14:51 +0200
  Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-01 07:10 +0000
    Re: lamda-optimization Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-06-01 10:29 +0100
    Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_x510g@6uikovuenojv.gov.uk - 2021-06-01 18:27 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:10 +0200
        Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 00:14 -0400
          Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 07:26 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 01:47 -0700
              Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 11:49 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 09:34 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 15:50 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:28 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:45 +0000
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 17:58 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:14 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 16:19 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:38 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 17:46 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 18:00 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:17 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:11 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
          Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 09:39 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 10:23 +0200
              Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:38 -0700
            Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:15 -0400
              Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-02 19:01 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:39 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:21 +0000
          Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_2TF@zp_6z10zl3.info - 2021-06-03 08:12 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-02 05:05 +0000
        Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_9na7kf9y25@bv5tkwx.biz - 2021-06-03 08:10 +0000

csiph-web