Re: lamda-optimization

From	David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: lamda-optimization
Date	2021-06-02 16:19 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<s9841l$8bc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <kh5ebg9difm5a9rp3btvk85c2oe60qtn6o@4ax.com> <875yywy7nl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <nvkebgp3pvkcmbet0auqe3clrjv4p8glcn@4ax.com> <s981cc$jpn$1@dont-email.me> <l43fbg92kfnb5o0ds0qrs9ealae23cbjs9@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 02/06/2021 15:50, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:34:04 -0400, James Kuyper
> <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/2/21 5:49 AM, Doctor Who wrote:
>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 01:47:58 -0700, Keith Thompson
>>> <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>> if you are not a moderator of this newsgroup please refrain from
>>> trying to educate people on how they must behave online.
>>
>> This is an unmoderated newsgroup, which means that Keith can't do any
>> more to stop you from acting rudely than you can do to stop him from
>> pointing out your rudeness. Enjoy!
> 
> Thus I am acting rudely because I defend a woman?
> 

You did not "defend a woman" - you /belittled/ a woman.  (Assuming, of
course, that Bonita /is/ a woman.)

Gender does not matter in programming, or in discussions about
programming.  Therefore, any treatment based on gender in a forum about
programming is necessarily sexist and prejudice.  It doesn't matter
whether you are attacking a person for their gender, or defending them
because of it.  You have, in essence, been saying that Bonita needs help
to argue on the internet because she is merely a woman - it is clearly
sexist on your part.

(It is absolutely fine to call out and complain about prejudice of any
sort - that is a different matter.)

> what nicety, and what a pity.
> 

It is a pity that people are rude and sexist.  I can't judge your
motives - without further evidence, I can assume that you meant well and
did not realise that you were being sexist.  But now you know.

Thread

Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-05-31 12:41 -0700
  Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 06:15 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 15:24 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-06-01 09:04 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 18:42 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2021-06-01 20:26 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:33 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-01 14:51 +0200
  Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-01 07:10 +0000
    Re: lamda-optimization Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-06-01 10:29 +0100
    Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_x510g@6uikovuenojv.gov.uk - 2021-06-01 18:27 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:10 +0200
        Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 00:14 -0400
          Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 07:26 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 01:47 -0700
              Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 11:49 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 09:34 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 15:50 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:28 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:45 +0000
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 17:58 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:14 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 16:19 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:38 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 17:46 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 18:00 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:17 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:11 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
          Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 09:39 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 10:23 +0200
              Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:38 -0700
            Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:15 -0400
              Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-02 19:01 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:39 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:21 +0000
          Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_2TF@zp_6z10zl3.info - 2021-06-03 08:12 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-02 05:05 +0000
        Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_9na7kf9y25@bv5tkwx.biz - 2021-06-03 08:10 +0000

csiph-web