Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #80035

Re: lamda-optimization

From Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: lamda-optimization
Date 2021-06-01 07:10 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <s94mgp$1l4$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <s90lmn$icr$1@dont-email.me> <s90mhf$2ha$1@dont-email.me> <bcf71774-0c95-4741-9d68-7f0b30ec584en@googlegroups.com> <s91nuk$e0p$1@dont-email.me> <s93e5p$5gc$1@redfloyd.dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> wrote:
> On 5/30/2021 9:16 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> You're so ultimately stupid.
> 
> Hint:  an ad hominem reply means you have lost the debate

That's not an ad hominem. Insulting someone is not an ad hominem. That's
a surprisingly (and sadly) common misconception.

An ad hominem argument is arguing against the claim made by someone by
alluding to something objectionable about that person, which has nothing
to do with the claim. Like, for example, "he has committed this heinous
crime, therefore what he's claiming about this mathematical proof is
not to be trusted" (not with those exact words, of course, but as the
fundamental idea). In the current day and age perhaps even more commonly
"he holds these political beliefs, therefore what he's saying (about
this thing completely unrelated to politics) is not to be trusted".

"An attack to the person" does not mean "being aggressive towards the
person (eg. with insults or swearwords)". It means "trying to discredit
what the person is saying by discrediting the reputation of the person".

"Argumentum ad hominem" could, perhaps, be more accurately translated
as "argument by attacking the reputation of the person".

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-05-31 12:41 -0700
  Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 06:15 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 15:24 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-06-01 09:04 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 18:42 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2021-06-01 20:26 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:33 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-01 14:51 +0200
  Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-01 07:10 +0000
    Re: lamda-optimization Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-06-01 10:29 +0100
    Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_x510g@6uikovuenojv.gov.uk - 2021-06-01 18:27 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:10 +0200
        Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 00:14 -0400
          Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 07:26 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 01:47 -0700
              Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 11:49 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 09:34 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 15:50 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:28 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:45 +0000
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 17:58 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:14 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 16:19 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:38 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 17:46 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 18:00 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:17 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:11 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
          Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 09:39 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 10:23 +0200
              Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:38 -0700
            Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:15 -0400
              Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-02 19:01 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:39 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:21 +0000
          Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_2TF@zp_6z10zl3.info - 2021-06-03 08:12 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-02 05:05 +0000
        Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_9na7kf9y25@bv5tkwx.biz - 2021-06-03 08:10 +0000

csiph-web