Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #472

Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20

From Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20
Date 2021-05-11 12:59 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <s7ed5m$5og$5@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <vH%lI.63798$qy1.24316@fx26.iad> <ifsumrFsoqiU1@mid.individual.net> <s7bqas$ru4$1@dont-email.me> <s7e81d$65q$7@dont-email.me> <ifvp4mFf2biU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/11/2021 12:19 PM, Ken Blake wrote:
> On 5/11/2021 8:32 AM, Michael Trew wrote:
>> On 5/10/2021 1:25 PM, The Real Bev wrote:
>>> On 05/10/2021 07:36 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
>>>
>>>> There are very few things in life that are needed.
>>>>
>>>> But what you *need* is irrelevant. What you should have is what you
>>>> *want*--what you like, what makes things easier for you, etc. I have
>>>> several add-ons in FireFox, and they are all useful; even though I
>>>> don't
>>>> *need* them, I like them very much.
>>>
>>> Actually, I NEED vertical tabs in Firefox.
>>>
>>> Most of the wide screen is useless, so VT is easier to read AND uses
>>> otherwise unused space. Win-win.
>>>
>>> The same function in Chrome works differently and not as well and is the
>>> main reason I hate Chrome and use it only for stuff that Firefox can't
>>> handle. How can people stand to have 30 illegible tabs across the top of
>>> the browser window?
>>>
>>
>> I disabled tabs in Firefox... they annoyed me. I recall about 2010 when
>> finally upgrading from IE 6, I never liked tabs. I currently have 5
>> browser windows open.
>
>
> A good example of "De gustibus..." We're all different and have
> different likes and dislikes. To me, tabs are almost a necessity.
>
>
That seems to be the general consensus, but I suppose that I go against 
the grain.

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-04-27 23:36 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Torsten Villnow <t.villnow@gmail.com> - 2021-04-28 08:48 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Wilf <wilf@postingx.uk> - 2021-04-28 17:39 +0100
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Teddy-Bears <Bears@invalid.com> - 2021-04-28 07:39 -0400
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-30 22:53 -0400
      Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-01 17:41 -0400
        Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-05-03 00:06 -0400
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Miguel Tomar Nogueira <mnogueira@mail.telepac.pt> - 2021-05-09 22:39 +0000
      Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-10 07:36 -0700
        Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-05-10 10:25 -0700
          Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-10 13:43 -0400
          Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-10 10:43 -0700
          Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-11 11:32 -0400
            Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-11 09:19 -0700
              Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-11 12:59 -0400
            Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-11 13:11 -0400
              Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-13 01:03 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-28 11:58 +0000
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-04-28 13:59 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-28 08:19 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 "David E. Ross" <not_me@not_there.invalid> - 2021-04-28 08:24 -0700

csiph-web