Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #453
| From | Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 |
| Date | 2021-05-10 10:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ift9maFclqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <s79oak$rr3$2@neodome.net> <s79qt5$bsl$1@news.mixmin.net> <vH%lI.63798$qy1.24316@fx26.iad> <ifsumrFsoqiU1@mid.individual.net> <s7bqas$ru4$1@dont-email.me> |
On 5/10/2021 10:25 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > On 05/10/2021 07:36 AM, Ken Blake wrote: > >> There are very few things in life that are needed. >> >> But what you *need* is irrelevant. What you should have is what you >> *want*--what you like, what makes things easier for you, etc. I have >> several add-ons in FireFox, and they are all useful; even though I don't >> *need* them, I like them very much. > > Actually, I NEED vertical tabs in Firefox. I understand why you want it, but I would never use the word "need" for that. > Most of the wide screen is useless, Because a wide screen *can* be useless, I keep my taskbar on the left side of the screen, not at the bottom. I also have several program open on each of my two screens, and doing that also uses up some of the available screen real estate. > so VT is easier to read AND uses > otherwise unused space. Win-win. > > The same function in Chrome works differently and not as well and is the > main reason I hate Chrome and use it only for stuff that Firefox can't > handle. How can people stand to have 30 illegible tabs across the top > of the browser window? I couldn't. I normally have five tabs open--all at the top--and only occasionally have another two or three. -- Ken
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-04-27 23:36 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Torsten Villnow <t.villnow@gmail.com> - 2021-04-28 08:48 +0200
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Wilf <wilf@postingx.uk> - 2021-04-28 17:39 +0100
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Teddy-Bears <Bears@invalid.com> - 2021-04-28 07:39 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-30 22:53 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-01 17:41 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-05-03 00:06 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Miguel Tomar Nogueira <mnogueira@mail.telepac.pt> - 2021-05-09 22:39 +0000
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-10 07:36 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-05-10 10:25 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-10 13:43 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-10 10:43 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-11 11:32 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-11 09:19 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-11 12:59 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-11 13:11 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-13 01:03 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-28 11:58 +0000
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-04-28 13:59 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-28 08:19 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 "David E. Ross" <not_me@not_there.invalid> - 2021-04-28 08:24 -0700
csiph-web