Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

From	Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth
Date	2016-04-23 19:10 +0200
Message-ID	<rr9ea-6Ge-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rqX3j-5ku-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr5tU-3ws-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr6SZ-4va-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:35:12 John Hasler wrote:

> Gene writes:
> > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff via
> > a daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory, still only
> > catches 10% of it.
>
> Interesting.  For me it catches 90%.  Do you feed it both spam and
> ham?

I feed it ham by moving stuff it should catch to the ham directory so its 
treated as ham on the next runs of sa-learn.  I could add a weekly 
sa-learn --ham session, nameing one or more of the cleaner folders from 
the mailing lists I suppose.  It was initially run over my cleaned up 
coco folder, which is several gigabytes of quite clean ham.  The initial 
run was many years ago.  Or, I suppose, I could use an int rnd(number of 
good folders) and the a stack of ifelses to do a name substitution based 
on the number and have it read them all at random intervals.

I should restrict the number of folders to those that I do have expiry 
times set on though.  Not all folders have expiry setup.  Those that I 
have primary interests in are here until I have an HD crash and no 
backups.  Since I run amanda every night, using a second HD as virtual 
tapes, that chance ranges from slim to point triple ought zip.  I may 
have the last blackout first at my age. :(

ATM I'm making parts for my mill on my lathe for another project that 
will triple the speed of the z axis on my mill, but there may be a down 
time before those replacement motor and driver parts all arrive in the 
next 2 weeks or so when I can slice up some bash code to do that.

Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10 
years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might 
have had the seeds of something to help. :)

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Thread

TCP/IP over Bluetooth peter@easthope.ca - 2016-04-23 06:10 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:40 +0200
    Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 07:10 +0200
      Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 09:40 +0200
        Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 13:20 +0200
          Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-04-23 14:00 +0200
            Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-04-23 14:20 +0200
            Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 14:40 +0200
              Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 14:50 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 15:10 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 16:40 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 19:10 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-04-23 19:30 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 20:00 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:20 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 22:10 +0200
                Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP  over Bluetooth) cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2016-04-27 10:40 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:00 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-04-27 11:20 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:50 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-27 14:20 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-27 14:50 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:10 +0200
              Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-04-23 15:50 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:00 +0200
    Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-04-23 11:30 +0200
      Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:30 +0200
        Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200

csiph-web