Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #167042
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth |
| Date | 2016-04-23 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rrbfY-8dY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rqX3j-5ku-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr9ea-6Ge-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rra0y-73x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:57:08 John Hasler wrote: > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last > > 10 years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question > > might have had the seeds of something to help. :) > > My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham directory which is fed to > sa-learn every night and then the contents of both the ham and the > spam directories are deleted. Humm, I don't delete the ham, but drag & drop it to whatever folder it goes to after its spent a day or so in the ham directory. I move the detected spam to a spam-hold directory in case I neglect to check for a day as its catching the order confirmations from ebay because ebay just has to use 99% of the confirmation message to sell more usually unrelated crap, and that spam-hold is deleted on the next sa-learn run. But thats a good idea for genuine ham, but so much crap gets thru I'd still have to go thru it and clean it up before sa-learn saw it. Its a thankless task for sure. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
TCP/IP over Bluetooth peter@easthope.ca - 2016-04-23 06:10 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:40 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 07:10 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 09:40 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 13:20 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-04-23 14:00 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-04-23 14:20 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 14:40 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 14:50 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 15:10 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 16:40 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 19:10 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-04-23 19:30 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 20:00 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:20 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 22:10 +0200
Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2016-04-27 10:40 +0200
Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:00 +0200
Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-04-27 11:20 +0200
Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:50 +0200
Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-27 14:20 +0200
Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-27 14:50 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:10 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-04-23 15:50 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:00 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-04-23 11:30 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:30 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200
Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200
csiph-web