Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

From	Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth
Date	2016-04-23 21:10 +0200
Message-ID	<rrb6i-8ad-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rqX3j-5ku-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr6SZ-4va-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr9ea-6Ge-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:01:33 Gene Heskett wrote:

> On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:35:12 John Hasler wrote:
> > Gene writes:
> > > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff
> > > via a daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory,
> > > still only catches 10% of it.
> >
> > Interesting.  For me it catches 90%.  Do you feed it both spam and
> > ham?
>
> I feed it ham by moving stuff it should catch to the ham directory so
Ancient fingers! should s/b shouldn't above.
> its treated as ham on the next runs of sa-learn.  I could add a weekly
> sa-learn --ham session, nameing one or more of the cleaner folders
> from the mailing lists I suppose.  It was initially run over my
> cleaned up coco folder, which is several gigabytes of quite clean ham.
>  The initial run was many years ago.  Or, I suppose, I could use an
> int rnd(number of good folders) and the a stack of ifelses to do a
> name substitution based on the number and have it read them all at
> random intervals.
>
> I should restrict the number of folders to those that I do have expiry
> times set on though.  Not all folders have expiry setup.  Those that I
> have primary interests in are here until I have an HD crash and no
> backups.  Since I run amanda every night, using a second HD as virtual
> tapes, that chance ranges from slim to point triple ought zip.  I may
> have the last blackout first at my age. :(
>
> ATM I'm making parts for my mill on my lathe for another project that
> will triple the speed of the z axis on my mill, but there may be a
> down time before those replacement motor and driver parts all arrive
> in the next 2 weeks or so when I can slice up some bash code to do
> that.
>
> Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10
> years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might
> have had the seeds of something to help. :)
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Thread

TCP/IP over Bluetooth peter@easthope.ca - 2016-04-23 06:10 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:40 +0200
    Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 07:10 +0200
      Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 09:40 +0200
        Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 13:20 +0200
          Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-04-23 14:00 +0200
            Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-04-23 14:20 +0200
            Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 14:40 +0200
              Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 14:50 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 15:10 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 16:40 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 19:10 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-04-23 19:30 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 20:00 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:20 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 22:10 +0200
                Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP  over Bluetooth) cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2016-04-27 10:40 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:00 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-04-27 11:20 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:50 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-27 14:20 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-27 14:50 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:10 +0200
              Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-04-23 15:50 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:00 +0200
    Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-04-23 11:30 +0200
      Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:30 +0200
        Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200

csiph-web