Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #11471

Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions.

From Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions.
Date 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000
Organization Fix this later
Message-ID <rp34ps$jum$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <bfdb5e55-4743-412b-9c38-6be521a7b055n@googlegroups.com> <rp0i4m$4hq$1@dont-email.me> <87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


On 17/11/2020 17:25, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
> 
>> On 17/11/2020 06:09, K R wrote:
>>> Lets look shapes with 3,4,5,6,... angles.
>>> They have inside ∞ crosses. Because by dividing areas with 2, we get ∞ points.
>>> Lets begin with 2 line connected shapes with 3 and 4 angles.
>>> We can continue to N shapes.
>>> Now lets start to go around these shapes with connecting shapes.
>>> Process can continue forever.
>>> So we get number N*∞*∞*∞ points.
>>> The biggest integer is ∞, so there are ∞^4 integers.
>>
>> No, ∞ is not an integer. There are infinitely many integers, and
>> therefore there can be no biggest integer.
> 
> That makes it sound like it is the infinitude itself that leads to the
> conclusion, but there are lots of infinite sets with a largest element.

Yes. The set of negative integers, for example; or the set of reals 
between 0 and 1.

>> This is easily proved by reductio. If we assume there is a biggest
>> integer I, we can immediately disprove the assumption by adding 1 to I
>> to form a new integer J that is 1 larger than I.
> 
> This is what leads to the conclusion: the axioms for the > relation.
> 
>> Therefore I is not
>> the biggest integer, even if we (quite improperly) assign ∞ to I.
> 
> (Oh, and hi.  Haven't seen you around for ages.)

(Yeah, hi. I'm around, but mostly here, on sci.crypt, and on 
rec.puzzles, all three of which are low-traffic - or low-signal, anyway. 
I stopped bothering with clc when it started morphing into a religious 
debating forum. I haven't been back to check whether that trend continued.)

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. K R <ownerofachattingportal@gmail.com> - 2020-11-16 22:09 -0800
  Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-17 13:10 +0000
    Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-17 17:25 +0000
      Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000
        Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 14:58 +0100
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khritjan Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-18 06:01 -0800
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:42 +0000
            Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 16:43 +0100
              Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 18:59 +0000
                Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:39 +0100
    Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-17 22:36 +0100
      Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:50 +0000
        Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 15:27 +0100
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:50 +0000
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-18 15:44 +0000
            Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 18:09 +0100
              Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 18:00 +0000
                Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:42 +0100
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 17:58 +0000
            Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:46 +0100
    Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-11-19 03:49 +0000
      Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khrictian Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-19 01:12 -0800

csiph-web