Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #11471
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. |
| Date | 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000 |
| Organization | Fix this later |
| Message-ID | <rp34ps$jum$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <bfdb5e55-4743-412b-9c38-6be521a7b055n@googlegroups.com> <rp0i4m$4hq$1@dont-email.me> <87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
On 17/11/2020 17:25, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes: > >> On 17/11/2020 06:09, K R wrote: >>> Lets look shapes with 3,4,5,6,... angles. >>> They have inside ∞ crosses. Because by dividing areas with 2, we get ∞ points. >>> Lets begin with 2 line connected shapes with 3 and 4 angles. >>> We can continue to N shapes. >>> Now lets start to go around these shapes with connecting shapes. >>> Process can continue forever. >>> So we get number N*∞*∞*∞ points. >>> The biggest integer is ∞, so there are ∞^4 integers. >> >> No, ∞ is not an integer. There are infinitely many integers, and >> therefore there can be no biggest integer. > > That makes it sound like it is the infinitude itself that leads to the > conclusion, but there are lots of infinite sets with a largest element. Yes. The set of negative integers, for example; or the set of reals between 0 and 1. >> This is easily proved by reductio. If we assume there is a biggest >> integer I, we can immediately disprove the assumption by adding 1 to I >> to form a new integer J that is 1 larger than I. > > This is what leads to the conclusion: the axioms for the > relation. > >> Therefore I is not >> the biggest integer, even if we (quite improperly) assign ∞ to I. > > (Oh, and hi. Haven't seen you around for ages.) (Yeah, hi. I'm around, but mostly here, on sci.crypt, and on rec.puzzles, all three of which are low-traffic - or low-signal, anyway. I stopped bothering with clc when it started morphing into a religious debating forum. I haven't been back to check whether that trend continued.) -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. K R <ownerofachattingportal@gmail.com> - 2020-11-16 22:09 -0800
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-17 13:10 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 14:58 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khritjan Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-18 06:01 -0800
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:42 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 16:43 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 18:59 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:39 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-17 22:36 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:50 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 15:27 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:50 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-18 15:44 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 18:09 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 18:00 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:42 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 17:58 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:46 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-11-19 03:49 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khrictian Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-19 01:12 -0800
csiph-web