Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #11479
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. |
| Date | 2020-11-18 16:43 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <rp3feb$52g$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rp0i4m$4hq$1@dont-email.me> <87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <rp34ps$jum$1@dont-email.me> <rp39a4$m0i$1@dont-email.me> <rp3bru$a0o$1@dont-email.me> |
On 18/11/2020 15:42, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 18/11/2020 13:58, David Brown wrote: >> On 18/11/2020 13:41, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>> On 17/11/2020 17:25, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 17/11/2020 06:09, K R wrote: >>>>>> Lets look shapes with 3,4,5,6,... angles. >>>>>> They have inside ∞ crosses. Because by dividing areas with 2, we get >>>>>> ∞ points. >>>>>> Lets begin with 2 line connected shapes with 3 and 4 angles. >>>>>> We can continue to N shapes. >>>>>> Now lets start to go around these shapes with connecting shapes. >>>>>> Process can continue forever. >>>>>> So we get number N*∞*∞*∞ points. >>>>>> The biggest integer is ∞, so there are ∞^4 integers. >>>>> >>>>> No, ∞ is not an integer. There are infinitely many integers, and >>>>> therefore there can be no biggest integer. >>>> >>>> That makes it sound like it is the infinitude itself that leads to the >>>> conclusion, but there are lots of infinite sets with a largest element. >>> >>> Yes. The set of negative integers, for example; or the set of reals >>> between 0 and 1. >>> >> >> In fact, there are 2 ^ 2 ^ ∞ infinite sets of real numbers with a >> largest element. That's ℶ₂, which is quite big. > > Did you remember the set of real numbers between 19.00041 and 23.00043? Yes, it's in there. > It's easily overlooked. You'd better check your list; if it's not there, > add it on, and that would make 2 ^ 2 ^ ∞ + 1, which is ever so slightly > bigger. > The weird thing about infinities is the difference between cardinals such as ℵ₀ and ordinals such as 𝜔 : 2 ^ 2 ^ ℵ₀ + 1 is the same size as 2 ^ 2 ^ ℵ₀ + 1, while 2 ^ 2 ^ 𝜔 + 1 is different from (and comes just after) 2 ^ 2 ^ 𝜔.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. K R <ownerofachattingportal@gmail.com> - 2020-11-16 22:09 -0800
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-17 13:10 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 14:58 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khritjan Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-18 06:01 -0800
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:42 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 16:43 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 18:59 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:39 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-17 22:36 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:50 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 15:27 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:50 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-18 15:44 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 18:09 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 18:00 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:42 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 17:58 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:46 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-11-19 03:49 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khrictian Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-19 01:12 -0800
csiph-web