Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420323
| From | Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags |
| Date | 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJkkN-4Rf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJiVH-46O-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJj5n-4ae-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> Documentation/coccinelle.txt suggests using the SPFLAGS >> make variable to pass additional options to spatch. >> >> Reorder the way SPFLAGS is added to FLAGS, to allow >> for options in the SPFLAGS to override the default >> --very-quiet option. >> >> Similarly, rearrage the FLAGS for org or report mode. >> This allows for overriding of the default --no-show-diff >> option through SPFLAGS. > > The first looks like a good idea, but do you find a use case for the > second? The diff that is shown in org or report mode may be sort of > random. It is just an easy hack to reuse the same pattern code for > context, org, and report modes, but there isn't an intent to see the diff > produced by context mode in org or report mode. I thought this at first, that org report mode wouldn't need it the diff. But if a user wishes to override the option, then why should we not accept that the user knows what they are doing? -Deepa
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags "Nicolas Palix (LIG)" <Nicolas.Palix@imag.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-20 22:40 +0200
csiph-web