Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420327
| From | Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags |
| Date | 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJkNP-5fY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJiVH-46O-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJj5n-4ae-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJkkN-4Rf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJkkN-4Rf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJkNP-5fY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > >> >> Documentation/coccinelle.txt suggests using the SPFLAGS > >> >> make variable to pass additional options to spatch. > >> >> > >> >> Reorder the way SPFLAGS is added to FLAGS, to allow > >> >> for options in the SPFLAGS to override the default > >> >> --very-quiet option. > >> >> > >> >> Similarly, rearrage the FLAGS for org or report mode. > >> >> This allows for overriding of the default --no-show-diff > >> >> option through SPFLAGS. > >> > > >> > The first looks like a good idea, but do you find a use case for the > >> > second? The diff that is shown in org or report mode may be sort of > >> > random. It is just an easy hack to reuse the same pattern code for > >> > context, org, and report modes, but there isn't an intent to see the diff > >> > produced by context mode in org or report mode. > >> > >> I thought this at first, that org report mode wouldn't need it the diff. > >> But if a user wishes to override the option, then why should we not > >> accept that the user knows what they are doing? > > > > I guess... Another issue is that the org/report mode output comes from > > python, and the diff output comes from ocaml. They are not synchronized. > > Ie, the report won't come out next to the relevant diff. > > Ok. I was just thinking of user as the final authority because I was > trying to get more > debug output for my script. And, yes I only wanted to override the --very-quiet. > I just thought since --no-show-diff was a similar issue, it would be > good to do the > same thing here. > > Let me know if you want me to leave out the second rearrange and submit a v2. I think it doesn't hurt anything, if Nicolas is OK with it. Thanks for noticing the --very-quiet issue. julia
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags "Nicolas Palix (LIG)" <Nicolas.Palix@imag.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-20 22:40 +0200
csiph-web