Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420329
| From | Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags |
| Date | 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJkNP-5fY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJiVH-46O-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJj5n-4ae-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJkkN-4Rf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJkkN-4Rf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> >> Documentation/coccinelle.txt suggests using the SPFLAGS >> >> make variable to pass additional options to spatch. >> >> >> >> Reorder the way SPFLAGS is added to FLAGS, to allow >> >> for options in the SPFLAGS to override the default >> >> --very-quiet option. >> >> >> >> Similarly, rearrage the FLAGS for org or report mode. >> >> This allows for overriding of the default --no-show-diff >> >> option through SPFLAGS. >> > >> > The first looks like a good idea, but do you find a use case for the >> > second? The diff that is shown in org or report mode may be sort of >> > random. It is just an easy hack to reuse the same pattern code for >> > context, org, and report modes, but there isn't an intent to see the diff >> > produced by context mode in org or report mode. >> >> I thought this at first, that org report mode wouldn't need it the diff. >> But if a user wishes to override the option, then why should we not >> accept that the user knows what they are doing? > > I guess... Another issue is that the org/report mode output comes from > python, and the diff output comes from ocaml. They are not synchronized. > Ie, the report won't come out next to the relevant diff. Ok. I was just thinking of user as the final authority because I was trying to get more debug output for my script. And, yes I only wanted to override the --very-quiet. I just thought since --no-show-diff was a similar issue, it would be good to do the same thing here. Let me know if you want me to leave out the second rearrange and submit a v2. -Deepa
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags "Nicolas Palix (LIG)" <Nicolas.Palix@imag.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-06-12 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-20 22:40 +0200
csiph-web