Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #72280

Re: Structured binding considered harmful

From jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Structured binding considered harmful
Date 2020-03-14 08:59 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <r4i2tk$frj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <r4efnn$f41$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1584155318.443830.189635.1004@monster.email-scan.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Le 14/03/2020 à 04:08, Sam a écrit :
> jacobnavia writes:
> 
>> Even WORST:
>>
>> What happens when the class is modified to have a new field?
>> All the structured binding constructs have to be modified to add the 
>> new field, and if you miss one crashes and bugs will inevitably happen.
> 
> Bullshit.
> 
> The code will fail to compile. And after fixing every return value, 
> you'll go back to your happy place.
> 


I said:

All the structured binding constructs have to be modified

Then you say:

Bullshit

and in the next sentence you confirm what I have said.

 > The code will fail to compile. And after fixing every return value,
 > you'll go back to your happy place.

And you seem to ignore the contradiction!

Too much C++ affects reasoning capacity?

Or is it simply that ypu are answering out of "C++ nationalism", i.e 
Trump's "My country right or wrong". as "My computer language right or 
wrong"

As most other answers to my critique, you just seem to be touched 
emotionally and your answers are emotional:

"spewing nonsense", etc.

Keep calm. We aren't speaking about your mother or about your country. 
We are diuscussing a computer language feature. That's all.

Breath deeply and now answer me: Why is this new construct necessary?

Wasn't the old way of writing them easier and more robust?

THAT was my question. Please answer it.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-13 00:13 +0100
  Re: Structured binding considered harmful Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> - 2020-03-13 00:46 -0700
    Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-14 09:10 +0100
  Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-13 09:40 -0700
    Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-14 09:05 +0100
      Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-14 03:19 -0700
        Re: Structured binding considered harmful Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-03-15 11:08 +0000
          Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-15 09:46 -0700
            Re: Structured binding considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-03-15 19:27 +0100
              Re: Structured binding considered harmful Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-03-15 15:15 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-03-16 05:23 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-03-16 05:54 +0100
              Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-16 00:20 -0700
  Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-13 23:08 -0400
    Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-14 08:59 +0100
      Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-14 10:09 -0400
        Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-14 18:32 +0100
          Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-14 18:33 -0400
  Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-15 17:50 +0100
    Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-16 00:11 +0100
      Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-16 05:24 +0100
        Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-16 06:46 -0400
          Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-16 12:52 +0100
            Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-16 08:32 -0400
              Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-16 13:51 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-16 20:06 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-17 06:37 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-17 07:17 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-17 18:37 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-03-17 18:50 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 06:30 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 11:38 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 08:17 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 13:19 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 08:31 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 14:15 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 10:13 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 15:45 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 11:36 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 17:59 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 13:18 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 18:27 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 14:41 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 19:46 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 19:46 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-19 06:41 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-19 07:02 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-19 12:41 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-19 06:10 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-19 14:15 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-19 19:23 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 09:18 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-03-20 05:31 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 13:40 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-20 08:50 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 09:30 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-20 10:13 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 10:36 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-03-21 12:06 +1300
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-20 16:37 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 17:17 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-21 10:09 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 11:21 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-03-21 13:09 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-03-21 22:33 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-03-20 17:30 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 10:49 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-03-20 18:47 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 17:41 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-20 18:06 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 06:31 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-21 09:50 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 14:59 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-21 10:42 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 16:09 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-21 11:12 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-20 18:05 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 15:57 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-20 23:23 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-03-20 21:08 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Ralf Goertz <me@myprovider.invalid> - 2020-03-21 08:24 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 01:36 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 06:30 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-21 09:51 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-22 13:22 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-03-22 13:24 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-03-22 06:32 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-22 07:59 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-22 13:02 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-22 17:09 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-22 13:35 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-22 17:54 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-22 17:19 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-22 21:46 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-22 19:06 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful danielaparker@gmail.com - 2020-03-22 17:11 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-22 22:16 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 20:38 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-25 20:01 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful danielaparker@gmail.com - 2020-03-22 10:58 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-03-23 07:41 +1300
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-03-22 15:01 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-22 10:24 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-03-20 20:15 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-21 08:32 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-21 11:27 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-03-21 13:34 +0000
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 07:11 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-21 10:45 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 08:03 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-19 08:24 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-03-19 09:05 +1300
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-18 19:47 -0400
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-03-18 11:43 -0700
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-03-18 19:48 +0100
                Re: Structured binding considered harmful James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-03-18 12:37 -0700
          Re: Structured binding considered harmful jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2020-03-16 16:11 +0100
            Re: Structured binding considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-03-17 08:17 +1300
            Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-16 13:12 -0700
            Re: Structured binding considered harmful Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2020-03-16 20:13 -0400
  Re: Structured binding considered harmful Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-17 19:46 +0000
    Re: Structured binding considered harmful Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-03-21 01:43 -0700

csiph-web