Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71225
| From | Manfred <noname@add.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: explicit specialization problem |
| Date | 2020-01-08 16:28 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <qv4sen$3b5$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <qv4g8q$m28$1@news.albasani.net> <1bf3538e-caec-401f-a3c2-69f53d60ee73@googlegroups.com> <qv4o5e$18f$1@news.albasani.net> <d2ea939d-3dfb-4bb4-9928-1333a27b23c8@googlegroups.com> <qv4qcj$r59$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 1/8/2020 3:53 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 08.01.2020 um 15:48 schrieb Öö Tiib:
>>> If you have a template-specialization of a class that implements
>>> all template-parameters it is headed with "template<>".
>
>> But not with "template<> template<typename T>"
>
> No, that's not related to the specialization-part.
After restoring proper (rudely removed) attributions,
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> Bonita Montero wrote:
>> template<>
>> template<typename T>
>> struct Lib<My<T>>
>> {
>> void f();
>> };
>
> The `template<>` does not make sense here.
It is clearly related to specialization. Ref:
template<typename T>
struct S
{
};
template<typename T>
struct S<T*>
{
};
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 11:26 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:26 +1300
Re: explicit specialization problem "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 23:23 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:29 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 22:34 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:46 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-07 22:58 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:36 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 03:56 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 13:00 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:02 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:15 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:48 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:53 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 07:16 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-08 16:28 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-08 15:00 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 14:44 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 02:20 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 19:42 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-09 19:40 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000
csiph-web