Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71246
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: explicit specialization problem |
| Date | 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87imlkjxza.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <qv4g8q$m28$1@news.albasani.net> <87tv56j8ml.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <qv5m0v$1vjn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87o8vdjrqf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <qv67f6$ah3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: > On 1/8/2020 6:20 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 1/8/2020 7:00 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>>>>> You had: >>>>>>>> template<> >>>>>>>> template<typename T> >>>>>>> Yes, but makes also sense and it is accepted by g++. >>>>> >>>>>> It does not make sense in that context ... >>>>> >>>>> And why does g++ accept this ? >>>> >>>> It's not accepted by recent gcc versions (8.x and above). >>>> >>> >>> Fwiw, still working with: >>> >>> g++.exe (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project) 7.3.0 >> >> Not sure what you mean by "working". > > Compiling, and generating an executable. I see. That's what I said, though I gave more a general answer. Your word "still" suggested you weren't simply give an example of what I'd said. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 11:26 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:26 +1300
Re: explicit specialization problem "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 23:23 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:29 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 22:34 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:46 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-07 22:58 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:36 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 03:56 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 13:00 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:02 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:15 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:48 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:53 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 07:16 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-08 16:28 +0100
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-08 15:00 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 14:44 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 02:20 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 19:42 -0800
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-09 19:40 +0000
Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000
csiph-web