Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71232

Re: explicit specialization problem

From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: explicit specialization problem
Date 2020-01-09 02:20 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87o8vdjrqf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <qv47r5$b8n$1@news.albasani.net> <d1b045d5-8554-431f-99ff-f02f715fdb85@googlegroups.com> <qv4g8q$m28$1@news.albasani.net> <87tv56j8ml.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <qv5m0v$1vjn$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:

> On 1/8/2020 7:00 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>>>> You had:
>>>>>>        template<>
>>>>>>        template<typename T>
>>>>> Yes, but makes also sense and it is accepted by g++.
>>>
>>>> It does not make sense in that context ...
>>>
>>> And why does g++ accept this ?
>>
>> It's not accepted by recent gcc versions (8.x and above).
>>
>
> Fwiw, still working with:
>
> g++.exe (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project) 7.3.0

Not sure what you mean by "working".  I just tried gcc.Godbolt.org and
the oldest version that rejects the code is 8.1.

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 11:26 +0100
  Re: explicit specialization problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:26 +1300
  Re: explicit specialization problem "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 23:23 +0100
    Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:29 +0100
      Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 22:34 -0800
        Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:46 +0100
          Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-07 22:58 -0800
            Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:36 +0100
              Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 03:56 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 13:00 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:02 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:15 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:48 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:53 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 07:16 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-08 16:28 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-08 15:00 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 14:44 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 02:20 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 19:42 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-09 19:40 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000

csiph-web