Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71212

Re: explicit specialization problem

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: explicit specialization problem
Date 2020-01-07 22:34 -0800
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <qv3t67$1dc0$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <qv1mcf$vi4$1@news.albasani.net> <qv30ce$5tr$1@dont-email.me> <qv3srr$3dl$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/7/2020 10:29 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>> template<>
>>> template<typename T>
>>> struct Lib<My<T>>
>>> {
>>>      void f();
>>> };
> 
>> The `template<>` does not make sense here.
>> Just remove that line.
> 
> Thanks.

Your code works for me wrt removing the extra 'template<>'. Actually, in 
gcc in default, it works as is. I get an output of:

void Lib<My<T>>::f()

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 11:26 +0100
  Re: explicit specialization problem Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:26 +1300
  Re: explicit specialization problem "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 23:23 +0100
    Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:29 +0100
      Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 22:34 -0800
        Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 07:46 +0100
          Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-07 22:58 -0800
            Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 10:36 +0100
              Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 03:56 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 13:00 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:02 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:15 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 06:48 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 15:53 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-08 07:16 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-08 16:28 +0100
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-08 15:00 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 14:44 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 02:20 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 19:42 -0800
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 18:17 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-09 19:40 +0000
                Re: explicit specialization problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-09 21:21 +0000

csiph-web