Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1235038
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant |
| Date | 2015-09-29 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qe2Pn-7mR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qdZHQ-2IS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qdZHS-2IS-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <qe2FJ-6Wy-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:55:13PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:28:27AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > #define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { \
> > - task_thread_info(p)->preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
> > + task_thread_info(p)->preempt_count = 2*PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
>
> Since it's not quite obvious why we use this magic value without looking
> at schedule_tail() details, maybe add a little comment? (Just "/* see schedule_tail() */").
Right, I fixed that in 12/11 v2. I'll change that around a bit.
> > + /*
> > + * Still have preempt_count() == 2, from:
> > + *
> > + * schedule()
> > + * preempt_disable(); // 1
> > + * __schedule()
> > + * raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock) // 2
> > + */
>
> I found that a bit confusing first, because that's a preempt_count()
> we actually emulate for a new task. Maybe something like:
>
> + /*
> + * New task is init with preempt_count() == 2 because prev task left
> + * us after:
> + *
> + * schedule()
> + * preempt_disable(); // 1
> + * __schedule()
> + * raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock) // 2
> + */
I think I'll move the comment to finish_task_switch(), but yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-29 11:50 +0200
[tip:sched/core] sched/core: Create preempt_count invariant tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-09-29 12:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 15:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-29 15:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-09-29 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-29 15:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-29 16:20 +0200
csiph-web