Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #162195

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Brian, Felix and Charlie,
> Persistant name generation is enabled by default since udev 220-7 and
> will be used on new installations or with new hardware. Existing
> installations and hardware which get upgraded to udev 220-7 are covered
> by the old 75-persistent-net-generator.rules and will keep their
> interface names
thanks for the fast response. However, it does not explain, why both machines 
are different.

Both machines were installed by DVD and both got the same settings and package 
versions. Both machines were installed by the same DVD and then of course 
upgraded by the internet. And both are running debian/testing. 

The only thing, which IMO would explain it, that the EEEPC is newer than the 
other one. But then the hardware must talk to the operation system and give 
more information to udev or systemd. Does this do such things? There was 
something mentioned in the doku, but I did not quite understand, what the doku 
meant.

And if enps10 is the "new" kind of naming network devices, is it then 
recommended to edit all configurations and change the entries from eth0 to 
enp1s0?

This would also mean, I guess, either 70-persistent-net-rules must also be 
edited or should be deleted. 

But all this makes not clear to me, what makes the decision, when enp1s0 or 
when eth0 is going to be created on a system at boot.

Thanks for reading.

Best

Hans

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-29 19:40 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-29 19:50 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-29 20:20 +0100
    Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-29 21:00 +0100
      Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-29 22:30 +0100
      Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-29 22:40 +0100
      Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2015-12-30 13:00 +0100
        Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 15:40 +0100
          Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-30 16:00 +0100
            Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 16:20 +0100
        Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 16:20 +0100
          Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-31 16:30 +0100
            Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-31 19:10 +0100
              Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-01 13:10 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-01 17:30 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:30 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-06 14:00 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-06 15:00 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-07 03:00 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-01-07 07:20 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-07 10:50 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 14:20 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 19:50 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-08 02:40 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-08 13:10 +0100
          MAC address and security (was: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2015-12-31 16:50 +0100
            Re: MAC address and security Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2015-12-31 23:20 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2015-12-29 20:20 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2015-12-31 22:20 +0100
    Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-31 22:30 +0100
    Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:30 +0100

csiph-web