Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #162765
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) |
| Date | 2016-01-07 14:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOiDT-9B-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qNVR0-1e8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNWN5-1SF-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qO81R-11M-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOc5s-46I-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOfmG-6i1-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu 07 Jan 2016 at 10:45:20 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-01-06 22:09:25 -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:
> >
> > > 70-persistent-net.rules contains:
> > >
> > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="30:8d:99:25:ad:3f", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> > >
> > > Still the same question: why eth0 only?
> >
> > Because the ethernet interface is the only one mentioned in 70-persistent-net.rules.
>
> But my question is: Why is the ethernet interface the only one
> mentioned in 70-persistent-net.rules?
Pass. 70-persistent-net.rules was generated on Jessie and carried over
to testing. You would need a Jessie install on the same machine to
investigate.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-29 19:40 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-29 19:50 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-29 20:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-29 21:00 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-29 22:30 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-29 22:40 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2015-12-30 13:00 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-30 16:00 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 16:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 16:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-31 16:30 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-31 19:10 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-01 13:10 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-01 17:30 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:30 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-06 14:00 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-06 15:00 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-07 03:00 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-01-07 07:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-07 10:50 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 14:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 19:50 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-08 02:40 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-08 13:10 +0100
MAC address and security (was: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2015-12-31 16:50 +0100
Re: MAC address and security Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2015-12-31 23:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2015-12-29 20:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2015-12-31 22:20 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-31 22:30 +0100
Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:30 +0100
csiph-web