Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

From	Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)
Date	2016-01-06 14:00 +0100
Message-ID	<qNVR0-1e8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <qLNkS-68I-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLPPJ-7P9-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qM6GS-2hD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMaKv-4Lm-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMxe1-1Xr-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-01-02 16:21:11 +0000, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 01 Jan 2016 at 17:22:37 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> 
> > On 2016-01-01 12:03:32 +0000, Brian wrote:
> > > On Thu 31 Dec 2015 at 19:08:18 +0100, Hans wrote:
> > > > What do 'ls /sys/class/net' and 'ip link' give without this addition?
> > > > 
> > > > I get:
> > > > 
> > > > ls /sys/class/net/
> > > > 
> > > > enp1s0  Io  wlan0
> > > 
> > > Interesting. One interface is renamed; one is not (wlan0).
> > 
> > On my laptop (installed from Jessie, then upgraded to unstable),
> > this is the opposite:
> > 
> > eth0  lo  wlp61s0
> > 
> > Quite strange...
> 
> Move 70-persistent-net.rules somewhere and do
> 
>   rmmod -v <driver>
> 
> followed by
> 
>   modprobe -v <driver>
> 
> Repeat with 70-persistent-net.rules returned to /etc/udev/rules.d. Any
> changes in 'ls /sys/class/net/'?

Well, I want to keep eth0 on my laptop because I have things
that depend on it. But what I was wondering is why I have
wlp61s0 instead of wlan0, i.e. why a rule for wlan0 hadn't
been added to 70-persistent-net.rules at that time.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Thread

Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-29 19:40 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-29 19:50 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-29 20:20 +0100
    Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-29 21:00 +0100
      Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-29 22:30 +0100
      Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-29 22:40 +0100
      Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2015-12-30 13:00 +0100
        Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 15:40 +0100
          Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-30 16:00 +0100
            Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 16:20 +0100
        Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-30 16:20 +0100
          Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2015-12-31 16:30 +0100
            Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-31 19:10 +0100
              Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-01 13:10 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-01 17:30 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:30 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-06 14:00 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-06 15:00 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-07 03:00 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-01-07 07:20 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-07 10:50 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 14:20 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-07 19:50 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2016-01-08 02:40 +0100
                Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-08 13:10 +0100
          MAC address and security (was: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2015-12-31 16:50 +0100
            Re: MAC address and security Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2015-12-31 23:20 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2015-12-29 20:20 +0100
  Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2015-12-31 22:20 +0100
    Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-12-31 22:30 +0100
    Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:30 +0100

csiph-web