Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1284593

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding
Date 2015-12-05 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <qColJ-3xO-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <qBLDH-3fK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLNo-3jj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLX3-3n9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBWps-1TF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBXES-2B5-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:26:58PM -0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On Fri, December 4, 2015 11:00, Mark Brown wrote:

> > OK, so the power domains should be being represented and managed as such
> > rather than using regulators - it's a better fit (doing things like
> > support atomic context) and it also sidesteps this.  For the things that
> > you say are clearly regulators should we have more information about
> > those?

> I'd prefer to handle them all as power domains since it fits better. Even
> if some of them are regulators there's no extra control or status interface
> and they're used like power domains to disable unused functionality.

OK, great - runtime PM is just generally a more idiomatic interface for
this.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 21:40 +0100
  [PATCH 2/2] regulator: bcm63xx: Add BCM63xx fixed regulator device Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 21:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-01 23:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 13:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-02 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-03 01:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-03 09:20 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-03 16:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 00:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-04 00:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 01:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-04 12:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 13:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-05 18:00 +0100

csiph-web