Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1284593
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding |
| Date | 2015-12-05 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qColJ-3xO-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qBLDH-3fK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLNo-3jj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLX3-3n9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBWps-1TF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBXES-2B5-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:26:58PM -0000, Simon Arlott wrote: > On Fri, December 4, 2015 11:00, Mark Brown wrote: > > OK, so the power domains should be being represented and managed as such > > rather than using regulators - it's a better fit (doing things like > > support atomic context) and it also sidesteps this. For the things that > > you say are clearly regulators should we have more information about > > those? > I'd prefer to handle them all as power domains since it fits better. Even > if some of them are regulators there's no extra control or status interface > and they're used like power domains to disable unused functionality. OK, great - runtime PM is just generally a more idiomatic interface for this.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 21:40 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] regulator: bcm63xx: Add BCM63xx fixed regulator device Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-01 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-02 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-03 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-03 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-03 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-04 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-04 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-05 18:00 +0100
csiph-web