Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1283710

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding
Date 2015-12-04 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <qBWps-1TF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <qBxhn-2o6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBDG9-6Nq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLDH-3fK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLNo-3jj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBLX3-3n9-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:51:16PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 03/12/15 23:45, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Are you *sure* these are regulators and not power domains?  These names
> > look a lot like they could be power domains.

> No, I'm not sure. Some of them are may actually be regulators (the "PHY"
> ones) while others are almost definitely power domains (like the "FAP"
> Forwarding Assist Processor).

OK, so the power domains should be being represented and managed as such
rather than using regulators - it's a better fit (doing things like
support atomic context) and it also sidesteps this.  For the things that
you say are clearly regulators should we have more information about
those?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 21:40 +0100
  [PATCH 2/2] regulator: bcm63xx: Add BCM63xx fixed regulator device Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 21:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-01 23:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 13:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-02 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-03 01:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-03 09:20 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-03 16:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 00:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-04 00:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 01:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-04 12:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-04 13:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree  binding Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-05 18:00 +0100

csiph-web