Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281761

Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately
Date 2015-12-02 14:00 +0100
Message-ID <qBfaP-7ik-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qunwt-7y6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qunwu-7y6-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:22:06PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> In order to evaluate tick dependency, we need to account SCHED_RR and
> SCHED_FIFO tasks separately as those policies don't have the same
> preemption requirements.
> 
> We still keep rt_nr_running as a cache to avoid additions between nr_rr
> and nr_fifo all over the place.

In which case you only need one of nr_fifo/nr_rr. Less accounting is
better.

Pick the one you need for the nohz_full condition, and leave the other.
A quick look at sched_can_stop_tick() seems to suggest nr_rr is the
interesting one. nr_rr < 2 should allow stopping the tick.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-02 14:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 15:20 +0100

csiph-web