Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281851

Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately

From Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately
Date 2015-12-02 15:20 +0100
Message-ID <qBgqe-8gM-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qunwt-7y6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qunwu-7y6-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBfaP-7ik-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:53:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:22:06PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > In order to evaluate tick dependency, we need to account SCHED_RR and
> > SCHED_FIFO tasks separately as those policies don't have the same
> > preemption requirements.
> > 
> > We still keep rt_nr_running as a cache to avoid additions between nr_rr
> > and nr_fifo all over the place.
> 
> In which case you only need one of nr_fifo/nr_rr. Less accounting is
> better.
> 
> Pick the one you need for the nohz_full condition, and leave the other.
> A quick look at sched_can_stop_tick() seems to suggest nr_rr is the
> interesting one. nr_rr < 2 should allow stopping the tick.

Sounds pretty good! I'm going to do that!

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-02 14:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 15:20 +0100

csiph-web