Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1225458
| From | bsegall@google.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig |
| Date | 2015-09-15 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q923D-2S5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <q7tKF-7d0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7zZM-7Wu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8Bwu-6Es-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8FTs-4AL-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8SdX-5qT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:34:00AM -0700, bsegall@google.com wrote: >> >> SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION and the non-SLR part of SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT are not >> >> required to be the same value and should not be conflated. >> >> >> >> In particular, since cgroups are on the same timeline as tasks and their >> >> shares are not scaled by SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT in any way (but are scaled so >> >> that SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION is invisible), changing that part of >> >> SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT would cause issues, since things can assume that nice-0 >> >> = 1024. However changing SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION would be fine, as that is >> >> an internal value to the kernel. >> >> >> >> In addition, changing the non-SLR part of SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT would require >> >> recomputing all of prio_to_weight/wmult for the new NICE_0_LOAD. >> > >> > I think I follow, but doesn't that mean that the current code is broken >> > too? NICE_0_LOAD changes if you change SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION: >> > >> > #define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (10 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION) >> > #define SCHED_LOAD_SCALE (1L << SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT) >> > >> > #define NICE_0_LOAD SCHED_LOAD_SCALE >> > #define NICE_0_SHIFT SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT >> > >> > To me it sounds like we need to define it the other way around: >> > >> > #define NICE_0_SHIFT 10 >> > #define NICE_0_LOAD (1L << NICE_0_SHIFT) >> > >> > and then add any additional resolution bits from there to ensure that >> > NICE_0_LOAD and the prio_to_weight/wmult tables are unchanged. >> >> No, NICE_0_LOAD is supposed to be scale_load(prio_to_weight[nice_0]), >> ie including SLR. It has never been clear to me what >> SCHED_LOAD_SCALE/SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT were for as opposed to NICE_0_LOAD, >> and the new utilization uses of it are entirely unlinked to 1024 == NICE_0 > > Presume your SLR means SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION: > > 1) The introduction of (not redefinition of) SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT does not > change anything after macro expansion. > > 2) The constants in prio_to_weight[] and prio_to_wmult[] are tied to a > resolution of 10bits NICE_0, i.e., 1024, I guest it is the user visible > part you mentioned, so is the cgroup share. > > To me, it is all ok. With the SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT, the basic resolution > unit, it is just for us to state clearly, the NICE_0's weight has a fixed > resolution of SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT, or even add this: > > #if prio_to_weight[20] != 1 << SCHED_RESOLUTION_SHIFT > error "NICE_0 weight not calibrated" > #endif > /* I can learn, Peter */ > > I guess you are saying we are conflating NICE_0 with NICE_0_LOAD. But to me, > they are just integer metrics, needing a resolution respectively. That is it. Yes this would change nothing at the moment post-expansion, that's not the point. SLR being 10 bits and the nice-0 being 1024 are completely and utterly unrelated and the headers should not pretend they need to be the same value, any more than there should be a #define that is shared with every other use of 1024 in the kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2015-09-07 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-07 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2015-09-07 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-07 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-10 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-10 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-10 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-10 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-11 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-10 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-09 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-09 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-09 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-11 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-17 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-17 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-21 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-21 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-22 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2015-09-11 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-11 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2015-09-11 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-10 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-10 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2015-09-08 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-10 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-10 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-11 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-11 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-12 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-14 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-14 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-14 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-15 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-15 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-16 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig bsegall@google.com - 2015-09-16 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-09-17 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> - 2015-09-15 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-16 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 13:50 +0200
[tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig tip-bot for Dietmar Eggemann <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-09-13 13:10 +0200
csiph-web