Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1223078
| From | Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 |
| Date | 2015-09-11 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q7CXD-3Ma-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q7k4H-BL-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7zZN-7Wu-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7Byx-1CO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7C1z-2qx-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 12:15 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:49:32 -0700 > > > Still, why would some kernel module specifically not want to > > use the fastest HW implementation, and explicitly ask for > > a slower driver? > > Temporary workaround if a bug is found. > > There is really no reason to prevent the user from having this > flexibility, and in return anyone can test any implementation > their cpu can support. Mmmm..., this is a restructuring of the algorithms within the glue code into multiple drivers instead of one and exposing them all. It is a bit orthogonal to the intention of this patch set. I think it is better that I create a separate patch on the glue code on top of this patch set to implement this. Herbert, do you agree with this approach? Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-11 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2015-09-11 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-11 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2015-09-11 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-11 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2015-09-11 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-09-11 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2015-09-11 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-09-12 10:20 +0200
csiph-web