Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
Date	2016-03-29 02:51 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<q67psc-hv1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <n92fdm$mn9$2@gioia.aioe.org> <7b92738d-5548-4f5c-b21b-74e50efab36c@googlegroups.com> <n936st$1uua$1@gioia.aioe.org> <14dca3dc-7323-472f-ab28-36d022376039@googlegroups.com> <7OSdnV9zbMshfWTLnZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/6/16 7:13 AM, kenseto wrote:
>> Einstein and physicists are wrong.
> 
>   How come all test of SR and GTR come out correctly in experiments by
>   physicists?
 
My bad; almost 2 months and three sentences total.

 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 20:56 -0500
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-29 02:51 +0000

csiph-web