Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #566375 > unrolled thread

Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-28 20:56 -0500
Last post2016-03-29 02:51 +0000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 20:56 -0500
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-29 02:51 +0000

#566375 — Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-28 20:56 -0500
SubjectRe: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)
Message-ID<7OSdnV9zbMshfWTLnZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
On 2/6/16 7:13 AM, kenseto wrote:
> Einstein and physicists are wrong.

   How come all test of SR and GTR come out correctly in experiments by
   physicists?



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#566385

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-03-29 02:51 +0000
Message-ID<q67psc-hv1.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#566375
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/6/16 7:13 AM, kenseto wrote:
>> Einstein and physicists are wrong.
> 
>   How come all test of SR and GTR come out correctly in experiments by
>   physicists?
 
My bad; almost 2 months and three sentences total.

 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web