Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550775
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) |
| Date | 2016-02-05 16:14 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n936st$1uua$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <58ad79f5-0fce-4abd-861c-617d12cb13ab@googlegroups.com> <NImdndh-74dIxi_LnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com> <e98c5b2f-5150-4a9c-afdd-64727d66a8f3@googlegroups.com> <n92fdm$mn9$2@gioia.aioe.org> <7b92738d-5548-4f5c-b21b-74e50efab36c@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/5/2016 3:35 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 10:34:21 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 2/5/2016 9:16 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> Wormy failed to recognize that RoS is in direct conflict with the P2. For example in Einstein's train gedanken: >>> 1. The ground observer using RoS claims that the speed of light (or the closing speed of light) in the train is >>> anisotropic. >> >> Einstein never said that the closing speed of light and the speed of >> light mean the same thing. You call them the same, but that's YOUR >> addition and what makes it nonsense. Stop adding stuff out of your own >> head, and it will cease to be nonsense. > > Idiot....there is no such thing as different closing speeds for light. Oh, but there is. Physicists say there is, Einstein said there is. > That's why that it is not measurable. > The actual speed of light is measurable to be isotropic and therefore the so call closing speed of light is the > same as the speed of light. Doesn't follow logically. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-03 05:41 -0800
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:48 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-03 07:29 -0800
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:58 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 07:16 -0800
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:34 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 13:35 -0800
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 16:14 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-06 05:13 -0800
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-06 13:42 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 08:08 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-06 10:39 -0800
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:43 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 09:18 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 09:05 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:36 -0600
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 13:37 -0800
csiph-web