Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #727762

Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...
Date 2019-02-17 21:08 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q4cih2$1ej2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <09cec426-22ee-4332-9c7c-b88605fe6b0c@googlegroups.com> <q4cdd8$n8n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <25d4fb57-46be-4d2c-96fd-cf5c4edb37ca@googlegroups.com> <q4chjb$1aci$1@gioia.aioe.org> <q4cic2$1dtr$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Odd
>>> “
>>> 
>>> Particles ARE quantized disturbances in fields. 
>>> 
>>> “
>>> Yes. And they help create the field below them by their emissions.
>> 
>> “Above” and “below” have no meaning for fields. 
>> 
>> There you go again, using words as though you know what they mean when you
>> plainly don’t. Nor are you interested in learning what they mean. You’re
>> too self-absorbed to be interested in anything but your own mental
>> products. 
>> 
>>> You are way too black and white.
>>> You need to quit reading and start weeding out what doesn’t mesh together.
>>> Start now.
>>> Quit running your mouth when you obviously don’t have a coherent conceptual model.
>>> 
>> 
>> Again, the conceptual model is very clear to those that know what the words
>> mean. 
>> 
>> Since you believe that “conceptual model” means “can be explained in
>> everyday language so that third graders can follow it”, you don’t even know
>> what THAT term means. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> John, you’re pretty easy to read. 
> 
> You’ve felt stupid for a good chunk of your life, and you don’t like the
> feeling. So you don’t read physics out of anxiety that it’s going to be
> over your head and make you feel stupid. Instead, you mask that by snorting
> that reading is for sheep and chumps, and insisting that originality, even
> supremely uninformed originality is better than figuring out what others
> are trying to explain. 
> 
> And while you KNOW it’s just a pretense, you just can’t help but indulge
> the addictive pleasures of using high-sounding words like “dimension” and
> “fractal” and “standing-wave” and “uncertainty principle” and “precession”
> and “photon”, not really caring that you don’t have a clear idea of what
> the words means. And you string together these words in a short paragraph
> and a picture, because that’s what you imagine physics SHOULD be (if you
> were in charge). 
> 
> As soon as the smallest, most basic thing gets explained to you, the urge
> to smother it with your kookbabble phrases and the “inspiration” to make
> another GIF just overwhelms you, and off you go headlong into the weeds
> again. 
> 
> And you’d love it, thank you very much, if folks would just let you indulge
> your little compulsive charade without calling you out. 
> 

And this is where you call me a dick for being brutally honest with you. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 21:49 -0800
  ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 21:52 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 00:02 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 05:03 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 14:54 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:03 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:22 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:13 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:20 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:24 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 08:43 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0800
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:51 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-13 21:03 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:29 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:03 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:07 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:10 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 03:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 00:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:20 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 09:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 11:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 21:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 13:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:24 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:14 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 06:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 01:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 13:22 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 05:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:10 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 12:41 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:25 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 17:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 22:30 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 07:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 16:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 16:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 00:51 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:11 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 19:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:53 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 08:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:07 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:25 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 09:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:57 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:01 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:28 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:37 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 16:43 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 11:34 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:08 +0000
                My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 15:39 -0800
                Re: My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-17 23:46 +0000
                When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 16:29 -0800
                Re: When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:49 +0000
                GallopingInsanity Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 17:02 -0800
                Re: GallopingInsanity Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:28 +0000
                Re: GallopingInsanity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-18 15:47 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 07:59 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 18:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 02:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 04:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:14 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:48 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:01 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:05 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 13:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 03:04 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 19:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 05:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 10:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 11:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:40 -0700
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 20:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 13:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 16:18 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 01:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 09:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 18:40 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 20:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:26 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 13:58 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 22:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:35 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 03:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:31 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 15:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:10 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 12:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 08:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 18:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 16:50 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 23:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 02:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 13:52 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 15:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 16:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 21:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 04:03 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 01:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 09:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-25 11:17 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 05:45 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 10:04 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 07:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-26 22:40 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 00:08 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-27 00:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 08:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:27 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-21 03:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-19 15:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 21:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:03 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:54 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 23:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Earle Jones <earledjones@icloud.com> - 2019-02-15 17:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 07:37 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 14:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:51 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:44 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 04:57 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 22:57 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:24 -0500
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 18:32 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:47 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:33 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:05 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-15 18:41 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:13 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:25 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Buck Futter <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:37 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:34 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-16 18:17 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-17 21:50 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:47 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 21:35 -0800

csiph-web