Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #727499

Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...
Date 2019-02-15 13:22 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q46eeh$daa$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <1b85404d-a592-482f-9b7a-e6fc6e2e50fb@googlegroups.com> <q44v03$1qne$2@gioia.aioe.org> <1b70dfd4-cf12-426d-ba5e-a7868fc5f351@googlegroups.com> <q45mk3$ur4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <44eec6ca-51e1-4d8b-86be-791930096cee@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “3rd grade baiting ain’t gonna matter”
> Prove you understand it.
> Explain it.
> You’re not even 3rd grade if you can’t.
> 
> The thing is- you know all you got is mathematical smoke and mirrors.

I’ll repeat: “Yes I do understand it. YOU don’t. Because you don’t
understand any of the language used to describe it. And because YOU don’t
understand, you claim nobody does. You arrogant ass.”

> 
> I’ve said this many times, and we always end up here, where you say the
> ONLY way your Model can be understood is mathematically. 

The BEST way. You don’t speak the language. This pisses you off. It pisses
you off that a woodworker can learn the language and you’re too chickenshit
to TRY. Instead you do everything you can to discredit the language, to
lower the bar to your level. Chickenshits are not owed an explanation at
their level. 

Suck it up, John. Stop bitching and start learning. What’s your excuse?

> Mathematically describe a horse.
> Mathematically describe a bird.
> Mathematically describe SHIT. 
> You can’t.
> You are STILL an idiot
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 21:49 -0800
  ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 21:52 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 00:02 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 05:03 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 14:54 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:03 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:22 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:13 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:20 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:24 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 08:43 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0800
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:51 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-13 21:03 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:29 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:03 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:07 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:10 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 03:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 00:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:20 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 09:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 11:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 21:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 13:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:24 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:14 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 06:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 01:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 13:22 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 05:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:10 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 12:41 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:25 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 17:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 22:30 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 07:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 16:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 16:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 00:51 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:11 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 19:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:53 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 08:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:07 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:25 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 09:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:57 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:01 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:28 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:37 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 16:43 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 11:34 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:08 +0000
                My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 15:39 -0800
                Re: My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-17 23:46 +0000
                When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 16:29 -0800
                Re: When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:49 +0000
                GallopingInsanity Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 17:02 -0800
                Re: GallopingInsanity Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:28 +0000
                Re: GallopingInsanity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-18 15:47 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 07:59 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 18:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 02:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 04:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:14 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:48 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:01 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:05 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 13:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 03:04 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 19:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 05:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 10:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 11:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:40 -0700
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 20:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 13:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 16:18 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 01:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 09:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 18:40 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 20:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:26 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 13:58 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 22:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:35 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 03:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:31 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 15:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:10 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 12:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 08:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 18:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 16:50 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 23:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 02:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 13:52 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 15:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 16:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 21:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 04:03 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 01:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 09:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-25 11:17 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 05:45 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 10:04 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 07:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-26 22:40 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 00:08 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-27 00:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 08:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:27 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-21 03:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-19 15:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 21:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:03 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:54 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 23:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Earle Jones <earledjones@icloud.com> - 2019-02-15 17:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 07:37 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 14:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:51 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:44 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 04:57 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 22:57 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:24 -0500
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 18:32 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:47 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:33 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:05 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-15 18:41 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:13 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:25 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Buck Futter <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:37 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:34 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-16 18:17 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-17 21:50 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:47 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 21:35 -0800

csiph-web