Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #727761

Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??...
Date 2019-02-17 21:06 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q4cic2$1dtr$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <q4c302$167s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <09cec426-22ee-4332-9c7c-b88605fe6b0c@googlegroups.com> <q4cdd8$n8n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <25d4fb57-46be-4d2c-96fd-cf5c4edb37ca@googlegroups.com> <q4chjb$1aci$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Odd
>> “
>> 
>> Particles ARE quantized disturbances in fields. 
>> 
>> “
>> Yes. And they help create the field below them by their emissions.
> 
> “Above” and “below” have no meaning for fields. 
> 
> There you go again, using words as though you know what they mean when you
> plainly don’t. Nor are you interested in learning what they mean. You’re
> too self-absorbed to be interested in anything but your own mental
> products. 
> 
>> You are way too black and white.
>> You need to quit reading and start weeding out what doesn’t mesh together.
>> Start now.
>> Quit running your mouth when you obviously don’t have a coherent conceptual model.
>> 
> 
> Again, the conceptual model is very clear to those that know what the words
> mean. 
> 
> Since you believe that “conceptual model” means “can be explained in
> everyday language so that third graders can follow it”, you don’t even know
> what THAT term means. 
> 
> 
> 

John, you’re pretty easy to read. 

You’ve felt stupid for a good chunk of your life, and you don’t like the
feeling. So you don’t read physics out of anxiety that it’s going to be
over your head and make you feel stupid. Instead, you mask that by snorting
that reading is for sheep and chumps, and insisting that originality, even
supremely uninformed originality is better than figuring out what others
are trying to explain. 

And while you KNOW it’s just a pretense, you just can’t help but indulge
the addictive pleasures of using high-sounding words like “dimension” and
“fractal” and “standing-wave” and “uncertainty principle” and “precession”
and “photon”, not really caring that you don’t have a clear idea of what
the words means. And you string together these words in a short paragraph
and a picture, because that’s what you imagine physics SHOULD be (if you
were in charge). 

As soon as the smallest, most basic thing gets explained to you, the urge
to smother it with your kookbabble phrases and the “inspiration” to make
another GIF just overwhelms you, and off you go headlong into the weeds
again. 

And you’d love it, thank you very much, if folks would just let you indulge
your little compulsive charade without calling you out. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 21:49 -0800
  ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 21:52 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 00:02 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 05:03 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 14:54 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:03 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:22 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:13 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:20 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 05:24 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:43 +0000
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 08:43 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 11:24 -0800
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:51 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-13 21:03 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 13:29 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:03 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:07 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
            Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:10 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0800
              Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 03:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 00:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:20 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 09:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 17:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 11:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 21:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 13:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:27 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:24 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:14 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 06:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 01:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 13:22 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 05:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:10 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 12:41 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:25 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 17:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-15 22:30 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 07:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 16:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 14:35 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 16:10 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 00:51 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:11 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 02:12 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 19:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:53 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 08:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:07 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:25 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 09:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:57 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:01 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:28 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 00:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 19:13 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:16 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 05:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:37 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 16:43 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 11:34 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 12:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:52 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 21:08 +0000
                My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 15:39 -0800
                Re: My (non-vocalized) transcendental meditation chant is "nonsense", not "ohm". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-17 23:46 +0000
                When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 16:29 -0800
                Re: When did your obsession with octogenarians begin ? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:49 +0000
                GallopingInsanity Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-17 17:02 -0800
                Re: GallopingInsanity Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:28 +0000
                Re: GallopingInsanity Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-18 15:47 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 14:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 20:50 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 07:59 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 18:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 00:50 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 02:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 04:44 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 19:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:02 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:14 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:48 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 21:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:01 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 14:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:05 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 13:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 03:04 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 19:31 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:41 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 05:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 15:11 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 10:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 11:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:40 -0700
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 20:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 13:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 16:18 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 01:58 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 19:42 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:15 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 09:37 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 18:40 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:05 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 20:30 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 12:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:26 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 13:58 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 22:18 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:35 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 03:15 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:31 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 23:08 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 15:53 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 21:10 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 12:42 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 08:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 18:06 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 16:50 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 23:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 02:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:35 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:32 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 13:52 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 15:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 16:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 21:33 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 04:03 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 01:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 09:51 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-25 11:17 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 05:45 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:55 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:59 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 10:04 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 07:27 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-26 22:40 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 00:08 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-27 00:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-23 07:28 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-22 08:52 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 17:27 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-21 03:57 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-19 15:29 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 23:56 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 21:04 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:55 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:03 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:54 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 23:56 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-16 09:21 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Earle Jones <earledjones@icloud.com> - 2019-02-15 17:38 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 07:37 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 14:36 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 13:51 -0500
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:44 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:19 -0800
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 04:57 +0000
                Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 22:57 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:24 -0500
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 18:32 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 21:47 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:33 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 18:05 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-15 18:41 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:13 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 00:25 -0800
          Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... Buck Futter <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:37 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE  MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-14 12:34 -0800
  Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-16 18:17 -0800
    Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-17 21:50 -0800
      Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 20:47 -0800
        Re: ARE ''FIELDS '' THE MOST BASIC PHYSICAL ENTITY ??... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-18 21:35 -0800

csiph-web