Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #118378

Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy

From	Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups	misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.os.linux, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy
Date	2019-02-09 20:12 +0000
Organization	NOYB
Message-ID	<q3nfn0.gl0.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <q3krvb$k04$1@dont-email.me> <q3n5r3.74c.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <q3n373$2a8$1@dont-email.me> <q3n7jj.74c.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <q3n4vv$f9b$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote:
> On 2019-02-09, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> > William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote:
> >> On 2019-02-09, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> >   My Y5 (Y560-L02) has 850, 1900 and 2100MHz 3G bands, which covers most
> >> > of the world, including AU/NZ (which partly use 850MHz) and the US.
> >> 
> >> Yes, it will also depend on the exact model of the phone. The Y6 has
> >> three models, one of which works in Europe one in US and one in Asia.
> >> So you cannot even just say "I want model number X" but have to look at
> >> the submodel number as well. 
> >
> >   Probably not totally correct, considering that my Y560-L02 works in
> > Europe *and* in the US *and* in (many/most parts of) Asia.
> 
> I see, and because your one phone does cover that whole area, most
> phones do?

  Do you get your straw men in bulk!?

  I am comparing my Y5 to your Y6, i.e. to a *newer* phone of the *same*
manufacturer. Hence I'm not talking about other phones, let alone about
most other phones.

  So if "three models, one of which works in Europe one in US and one in
Asia" is not correct for the Y5, it's likely not correct for the Y6
either. That's all I'm saying.

  (AFAIC,) EOD.

[Repeated backpedals/rewriting_history deleted.]

Thread

Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy <anon@anon.com> - 2019-02-06 03:52 +0000
  Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-05 23:25 -0500
    Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-06 08:45 +0000
      Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-06 10:43 -0500
        Re: PureOS and Librem laptops <anon@anon.com> - 2019-02-07 22:39 +0000
          Re: PureOS and Librem laptops nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-07 22:47 -0500
      Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-06 16:24 +0000
        Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-07 21:43 +0100
          Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-07 22:56 +0000
            Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-07 23:42 +0000
              Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 07:52 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2019-02-08 02:59 -0600
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-02-08 13:13 +0100
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-08 18:53 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-08 21:27 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 16:23 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-09 17:28 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2019-02-09 19:01 +0100
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 18:25 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-09 18:43 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 19:53 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-10 08:38 -0800
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-08 21:22 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 15:03 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-09 17:18 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 17:40 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-09 18:13 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-10 08:39 -0800
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 22:51 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 17:24 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-09 17:38 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 17:53 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-09 18:09 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-09 20:12 +0000
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-02-09 23:34 +0100
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-02-10 00:55 +0100
                Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2019-02-09 18:57 +0100
          Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-07 23:40 +0000
            Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-08 06:51 +0100
        Re: PureOS and Librem laptops <anon@anon.com> - 2019-02-07 22:29 +0000
          Re: PureOS and Librem laptops William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-07 23:46 +0000
          Re: PureOS and Librem laptops nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-07 22:47 -0500
  Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-06 04:39 +0000
    PureOS and Librem laptops <anon@anon.com> - 2019-02-06 06:23 +0000
      Re: PureOS and Librem laptops "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-06 07:56 -0600
        Re: PureOS and Librem laptops <anon@anon.com> - 2019-02-07 22:25 +0000
        Re: PureOS and Librem laptops Mitch <m.mac@mixnym.net> - 2019-02-08 14:53 +0800
          Re: PureOS and Librem laptops "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-08 08:15 -0600
            Re: PureOS and Librem laptops John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 11:03 -0800
            Re: PureOS and Librem laptops Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-02-16 13:16 +0100
              Re: PureOS and Librem laptops Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-16 12:34 -0500
                Re: PureOS and Librem laptops John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-16 12:32 -0800
  Re: Linux-based smartphone focused on privacy befr@eaglesoft.de (Bernd Fröhlich) - 2019-02-06 12:05 +0100

csiph-web