Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood
Date	2019-01-08 09:35 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<q12g06$1bu9$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <q0s9eo$ik0$1@dont-email.me> <ea5221a8-2159-4a47-b12a-6f2e776df55c@googlegroups.com> <q0usj5$keh$1@dont-email.me> <4922110d-c510-4a54-80f2-4585019f7fbd@googlegroups.com> <q11cdf$294$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/7/2019 11:30 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 1/7/2019 11:01 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 10:46:00 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote:
>>
>>>> So, the fact that the vapor has a pressure that can be accounted for
>>>> using Dalton's law does not mean that vapor and gas are equivalent
>>>> in all other respects.
>>>>
>>>> Volney:
>>>> I am not interested in whatever it is you call "vapor". All I am saying
>>>> is that at, for example, 24C, the H2O phase diagram states that the
>>>> stable phase of H2O is gas below 3,000 pascals.
>>>
>>>> Yeah, so?
>>>
>>> The difference in definitions (vapor == same as gas except only below
>>> the critical temperature) is not important to this discussion.
>>
>>
>> Answer my question you evasive jackass.
> 
> I already did. Vapor is gas below the critical temperature.
> 
>>
>>>> Volney:
>>>> Dalton's Law states that
>>>> the presence of other nonreacting gases (N2, O2) doesn't affect this,
>>>>
>>>> CD:
>>>> What is "this"?
>>>
>>> "[at 24C] the stable phase of H2O is gas below 3,000 pascals."
>>>
>>>>   And where does Dalton's law state that it doesn't effect "this."
>>>
>>> That's the entire point of Dalton's Law! The presence of other gases
>>> does not affect the individual gas behavior.
>>
>> Answer the questions you evasive twit: 1) What is "this"? and 2) Where
>> does Dalton's law state that it doesn't effect "this."
> 
> You have some sort of reading comprehension problem.
> 
> "This" is the fact that at 24C the stable phase of H2O is gas below
> 3,000 pascals pressure.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton%27s_law
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure
> 
> That is as much as I am willing to spoonfeed you.

so more Spoonfeeding James McGinn,  use a smaller spoon...

> 
>> Checkmate.
>>
>> That was easy.
> 
> Yes, beating you was like taking candy from a baby.
>>
>> James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
>>
>

Thread

Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 20:15 -0800
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-03 20:22 -0800
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:40 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 10:08 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 10:49 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 18:24 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-05 00:53 -0600
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 10:03 -0800
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-05 00:53 -0600
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-05 09:42 -0500
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 15:14 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 21:00 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 21:53 -0800
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:18 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-05 21:52 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-06 02:13 -0500
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 12:11 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 13:58 -0800
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 22:16 +0000
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 14:31 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:26 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 17:01 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:50 -0800
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:29 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 00:11 +0000
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-06 02:09 -0500
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 11:47 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-07 01:34 -0500
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 23:10 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 09:42 -0600
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 09:19 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 19:10 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-06 19:42 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-07 01:48 -0500
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 22:58 -0800
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-07 09:44 -0600
            Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 08:01 -0800
              Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-08 00:30 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-07 22:22 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-08 09:35 -0600
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 09:27 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-08 13:00 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:34 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-09 00:53 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 10:08 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 11:46 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-09 20:11 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-09 20:23 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2019-01-10 21:08 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 09:47 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-12 13:02 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 10:07 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 18:21 +0000
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-13 02:40 -0600
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 18:46 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 13:41 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-26 20:16 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 07:49 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-01-27 12:24 -0500
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 11:46 -0800
                Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 12:16 -0800

csiph-web